Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJxE-0006cn-UC for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:58:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJxE-0001IJ-H3 for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:58:20 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJuv-0006f7-HQ for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:55:57 +0000 Received: from d96425fa.static.ziggozakelijk.nl ([217.100.37.250] helo=storagefox.foxi.nl) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdJut-0005sw-4R for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:55:57 +0000 Received: from techfox.localnet (techfox.foxi [192.168.0.31]) by storagefox.foxi.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v1DGtrNF024369; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:55:53 +0100 From: Frank van Vugt To: Stephen Frost Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:55:52 +0100 Message-ID: <2623240.ZhDaCM8aGs@techfox> Organization: Foxi Group User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/3.16.7-53-desktop; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170213141042.GJ9812@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <3534542.o3cNaKiDID@techfox> <23252987.YLsmlhlehZ@techfox> <20170213141042.GJ9812@tamriel.snowman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org Hi Stephen, Op maandag 13 februari 2017 09:10:42 schreef Stephen Frost: > We should be able to get it addressed shortly. Great, 'as always', I'd like to add! Thanks for the great work, people. This cannot be stated too often... > For your specific case Thanks for the additional info, interesting. > Yes, it's unfortunate that many users aren't really familiar with > schema-level privileges. Well, I didn't run into this issue with any of my db's that 'nicely' use tables in various schema's, it was actually the one 'older' db with everything in the public schema that brought it up, so maybe keeping one of those around isn't too bad an idea ;) -- Best, Frank. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general