Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-general-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1t8OF6-003tJ5-2T
	for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:25:27 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-general-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1t8OF3-00H8MD-Fo
	for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:25:26 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1t8OF3-00H8Jq-4f
	for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:25:25 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1t8OF1-000LQA-1t
	for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:25:24 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4A5IPLIi3075666;
	Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:25:21 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
cc: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Switching to NOINHERIT user triggers #XX000 error
In-reply-to: <CAFCRh-9TeQ=tWiMDKmSZBW3JxY60Nn6Mf4AnWohixKQFOk7+TA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFCRh-9byA_kmskbL5duYsjqZG3N78KuvY6TkiT3KuRo27=4QQ@mail.gmail.com> <3070156.1730828552@sss.pgh.pa.us> <CAFCRh-9TeQ=tWiMDKmSZBW3JxY60Nn6Mf4AnWohixKQFOk7+TA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
	message dated "Tue, 05 Nov 2024 19:21:35 +0100"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <3075664.1730831121.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:25:21 -0500
Message-ID: <3075665.1730831121@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-general.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-general-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-general>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3075665.1730831121%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 6:42 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This is probably a bug, at least to the extent that we don't like
>> XX000 errors to be easily reachable, so please let us know what
>> you find out.

> Finding where the error is thrown is easy, it's when I'm doing that grant.
> But the code creates two larguish schemas before that and several ROLEs,
> so it's not easy to share.

Really, we need a self-contained example case to do anything
about this.  Maybe you could anonymize the object names in
your test?

			regards, tom lane