Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wAYVC-0005Nz-1V for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:23:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wAYVA-001hn7-2S for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:23:49 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wAYVA-001hmz-1S for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:23:49 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wAYV9-000000003TA-1Fmx for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:23:49 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 638JNjsb3101340; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 15:23:45 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Matthias Apitz cc: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: configure && --with In-reply-to: References: <2040885.1775571708@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3061854.1775660369@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Matthias Apitz message dated "Wed, 08 Apr 2026 21:10:17 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <3101338.1775676225.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:23:45 -0400 Message-ID: <3101339.1775676225@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Matthias Apitz writes: > El d=C3=ADa mi=C3=A9rcoles, abril 08, 2026 a las 10:59:29a. m. -0400, To= m Lane escribi=C3=B3: >> You don't actually need to worry about that. It's only trying to >> report the result of "openssl version" for documentation's sake. >> We don't use that executable for anything beyond that. > Ok, fine with me. But the implementation of '--with-libraries' is wrong > or at least the documentation needs clarification if this implementation > is intentionally. [ shrug... ] I do not think it's incumbent on us to work with broken openssl installations. If your openssl doesn't cope with being run without any special LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting, you need to rethink how you're building it. regards, tom lane