Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------T13ZXkKP9GAAYYHhyEI8hDTM"
Message-ID: <32ae50a3-b6a3-4ca2-8051-9b0261ac430b@iseki.space>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:25:08 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Cc: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
References: <7901c7e4-69c6-4bb2-8e9d-ad556d493717@iseki.space>
 <35d3e799d47700dc217b1f211aa0e0d5f4de4e67.camel@cybertec.at>
 <7d36a2bd-3aae-4785-b8b3-ab14cca8fdc0@iseki.space>
 <b54c08b08ea531966162a4e73cb1343b91d81128.camel@cybertec.at>
 <a767cf97-1743-4dd7-add2-4eb0587efb25@iseki.space>
 <a1619427-47d0-4c2a-b187-0246343815c4@ewie.name>
 <2852693.1728656353@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: iseki zero <admin@iseki.space>
In-Reply-To: <2852693.1728656353@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/32ae50a3-b6a3-4ca2-8051-9b0261ac430b%40iseki.space>
Precedence: bulk

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------T13ZXkKP9GAAYYHhyEI8hDTM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

So, should I use the [reply to all] button? I'm afraid the receipt list 
will growing to have too many address.

BTW, I'm using Thunderbird. If you have better software, tell me please.

Sorry for my poor English.

iseki zero.

在 2024/10/11 22:19, Tom Lane 写道:
> Erik Wienhold<ewie@ewie.name> writes:
>> On 2024-10-11 15:00 +0200, iseki wrote:
>>> But why the mailing list haven't use the "Reply-To" header specify where to
>>> reply? Because the mail is you send to me directly?
>> The message author sets Reply-To, if necessary, according to RFC 5322.
>> Are there mailing lists that actually set this header?
> It's been done in the past, but current practice is strongly against
> it.  For example, in your own message that I'm replying to, there's
> a DKIM signature (RFC 6376):
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ewie.name; s=MBO0001;
> 	t=1728654419;
> 	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
> 	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
> 	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
> 	bh=7w7CHebdKaXtlhCMxa/jNIcoEy1tFhZmzOD+dT7nP8k=;
> 	b=K3s//HzYXU+chTDeY5p/wGwd5eglESiaugVSpGWo49ryL9ajLdimYMD3uIc3rr8PglZizV
> 	nk2wDiMsHnLR0EAgKsGzNvtxt4N9hHxMk7UI3F4XOVYqnemk95YVRNpFpEFww833uUqA+9
> 	RPypj/ezsKbi2vBzzXIoZ+Tf3t6XfuZYf6poq1J+ud0X278yQMnA1XbZNsenQkCWoYPiXb
> 	yklxY2Nbp9NyiDHCDQ0KPYAT6/0ttzbprNhgSzhN7LND6ehUvLlsmKG3rwqby2LmFRwliQ
> 	RDZ4MAxEzZKfOr8HGnubQf8FdQPGw6jlAn3U8199c+3QcIAWJ99Wrtb5rQPdEw==
>
> That lists "reply-to" as one of the signed header fields.  So if the
> mailing list were to modify Reply-To (including inserting one where
> there was none before) a DKIM-verifying recipient would regard the
> message as a forgery.
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>
>
--------------T13ZXkKP9GAAYYHhyEI8hDTM
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>So, should I use the [reply to all] button? I'm afraid the
      receipt list will growing to have too many address.</p>
    <p>BTW, I'm using Thunderbird. If you have better software, tell me
      please.</p>
    <p>Sorry for my poor English.</p>
    <p>iseki zero.<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">在 2024/10/11 22:19, Tom Lane 写道:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:2852693.1728656353@sss.pgh.pa.us">
      <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">Erik Wienhold <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ewie@ewie.name">&lt;ewie@ewie.name&gt;</a> writes:
</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">On 2024-10-11 15:00 +0200, iseki wrote:
</pre>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">But why the mailing list haven't use the "Reply-To" header specify where to
reply? Because the mail is you send to me directly?
</pre>
        </blockquote>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">
</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">The message author sets Reply-To, if necessary, according to RFC 5322.
Are there mailing lists that actually set this header?
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">
It's been done in the past, but current practice is strongly against
it.  For example, in your own message that I'm replying to, there's
a DKIM signature (RFC 6376):

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ewie.name; s=MBO0001;
	t=1728654419;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=7w7CHebdKaXtlhCMxa/jNIcoEy1tFhZmzOD+dT7nP8k=;
	b=K3s//HzYXU+chTDeY5p/wGwd5eglESiaugVSpGWo49ryL9ajLdimYMD3uIc3rr8PglZizV
	nk2wDiMsHnLR0EAgKsGzNvtxt4N9hHxMk7UI3F4XOVYqnemk95YVRNpFpEFww833uUqA+9
	RPypj/ezsKbi2vBzzXIoZ+Tf3t6XfuZYf6poq1J+ud0X278yQMnA1XbZNsenQkCWoYPiXb
	yklxY2Nbp9NyiDHCDQ0KPYAT6/0ttzbprNhgSzhN7LND6ehUvLlsmKG3rwqby2LmFRwliQ
	RDZ4MAxEzZKfOr8HGnubQf8FdQPGw6jlAn3U8199c+3QcIAWJ99Wrtb5rQPdEw==

That lists "reply-to" as one of the signed header fields.  So if the
mailing list were to modify Reply-To (including inserting one where
there was none before) a DKIM-verifying recipient would regard the
message as a forgery.

			regards, tom lane


</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>

--------------T13ZXkKP9GAAYYHhyEI8hDTM--