Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u3euQ-001J4h-Nl for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2025 17:44:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u3euP-007JrF-2J for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2025 17:44:49 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u3euO-007Jqz-Nn for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2025 17:44:49 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1u3euM-0050GF-1y for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2025 17:44:48 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 53CHiiHi371572; Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:44:44 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "David G. Johnston" cc: Igor Korot , "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Clarification on the docs In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "David G. Johnston" message dated "Fri, 11 Apr 2025 20:22:03 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <371570.1744479884.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:44:44 -0400 Message-ID: <371571.1744479884@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk "David G. Johnston" writes: > Because I’m undecided on what exactly would be an improvement and don’t > care enough on the basis of this single question to put effort into > figuring that out. Committers read these and if one of them wants to act > on my new paragraph suggestion great. If not, it isn’t that big a deal. > For me, this doesn’t warrant a CF entry. I agree this list has gotten a little messy over time, and also that it's not a big enough deal to warrant a formal patch process. I tried to improve matters at https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=78637a8be regards, tom lane