Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s6aSJ-000Wyy-Aw for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 May 2024 18:31:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s6aSJ-004Ff5-E5 for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 May 2024 18:31:23 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s6aPB-0049Ww-1G for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 May 2024 18:28:09 +0000 Received: from smtp119.iad3a.emailsrvr.com ([173.203.187.119]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s6aP8-0002Uw-Tt for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 May 2024 18:28:07 +0000 X-Auth-ID: xof@thebuild.com Received: by smtp31.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: xof-AT-thebuild.com) with ESMTPSA id DE346248ED; Mon, 13 May 2024 14:28:05 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\)) Subject: Re: UTC is not a time zone? From: Christophe Pettus In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 11:27:34 -0700 Cc: Tom Lane , "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <38C9B285-5F4B-4A94-BD34-6FE275A35A39@thebuild.com> References: <327870A4-F35C-462C-9F64-E0838374AFDF@thebuild.com> <63e65356-9cb5-48b7-9bc5-5c734013ebe1@aklaver.com> <828310.1715624225@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8DA3DC1C-E406-4921-8A86-A83BF140E13D@thebuild.com> To: Adrian Klaver X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1) X-Classification-ID: 54680c89-813d-4e89-a730-9c890cf12c29-1-1 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On May 13, 2024, at 11:26, Adrian Klaver wrote: > May not induce the error unless there are parallel workers involved. Indeed. I'll see about pulling together a test case that forces that.