Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F133C476AAF for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:07:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD69D476B09 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:07:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98D23D27; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:07:32 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" To: "Marie G. Tuite" , "Pgsql-General@Postgresql. Org" Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:07:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: sequence question Message-ID: <3E354B47.2770.6DC5E215@localhost> In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200301/1159 X-Sequence-Number: 36280 On 27 Jan 2003 at 14:06, Marie G. Tuite wrote: > Does anybody have a nice way to identify what table.column is using a > particular sequence on a database-wide basis? This makes me think you have a method you think is not nice. What is that method? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/