X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86275D83BD for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:12:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58113-02 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:12:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (128.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.128]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5893D81BB for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:12:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (clbb-248.saw.net [64.146.135.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8CF8xvM028864; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:09:00 -0700 Message-ID: <43259B20.4040906@commandprompt.com> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:13:36 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050727) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: barry@e-rm.co.uk Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Replication References: <1126525925.103304.219710@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <1126525925.103304.219710@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (hosting.commandprompt.com [192.168.1.101]); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:09:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.021 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200509/474 X-Sequence-Number: 83490 barry@e-rm.co.uk wrote: >I've looked into commandprompt.com's mammoth system, but it only >supports up to 1000 tables (the documentation doesn't mention this!) - >the database in question has more than 1000 tables, and adds new tables >regularly. Slony-I and pgpool apparently don't support dynamic >schemas, which I'd obviously need, so they're not quite up to the job >either. > Actually the theorectical limit for the Mammoth system is 10,000 tables, we have only tested up to 1000. This is metioned quite clearly on the website. It should be noted that if Slony-I won't do what you need then Mammoth probably would not either. Although Mammoth can add new tables on the fly as long as those tables are empty. If they are not empty they would cause a full sync to occur. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > >I'm currently looking at some sort of hack-job with the WAL archives >(see http://www.issociate.de/board/index.php?t=msg&goto=443099), but >this looks like a slightly flaky approach - have I missed the obvious >solution? Is there any stable software available which can replicate a >large and dynamic number of tables? > >Cheers, > >Barry > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > -- Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/