public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
Cc: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Rules and Command Status - update/insert/delete rule with series of commands in action
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 18:34:07 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR10MB695991BDE3588B549CE6A4D7A3F32@PH0PR10MB6959.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
References: <PH0PR10MB6959209E2B0F36BE765E9159A3F32@PH0PR10MB6959.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<PH0PR10MB695991BDE3588B549CE6A4D7A3F32@PH0PR10MB6959.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes:
> But I suppose that my next question, given what you both say about the
> RULE system being a dead-end, is whether there is any likelihood of
> supporting an INSTEAD OF trigger on a view at statement level? Maybe
> that stands more chance of going somewhere?
Perhaps, but I don't know of anyone working on it.
IIRC, the row-level-only restriction dates from before we had
implemented transition tables, so that at the time there was
nothing very meaningful that a statement-level trigger could do.
Maybe that problem has gone away, though I've not thought
about it very hard.
regards, tom lane
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Rules and Command Status - update/insert/delete rule with series of commands in action
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox