X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CEA9FB343 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:37:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40315-07 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:37:42 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: delayed 01:37:37.552747 by SQLgrey- Received: from kjeld.care4all.dk (cpe.atm2-0-52453.0x50a4a22a.esnxx3.customer.tele.dk [80.164.162.42]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333049FAD5A for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:37:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kjeld.care4all.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3181F4205CD; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:36:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kjeld.care4all.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kjeld.care4all.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23961-07; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:36:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.19.10.10] (x1-6-00-80-c8-03-a6-d7.k438.webspeed.dk [83.89.23.114]) by kjeld.care4all.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:36:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44E31FA1.2000001@pbnet.dk> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:37:37 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Poul_M=F8ller_Hansen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Mair CC: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Segmentation Fault References: <44E308B2.8030008@pbnet.dk> <1155732060.3835.1.camel@dell.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <1155732060.3835.1.camel@dell.home.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) (Debian) at care4all.dk X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.987 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/712 X-Sequence-Number: 99483 >> dmesg >> [2425253.737383] postmaster[4792]: segfault at 00002aaab6f0e000 rip >> 00002aaaab73795b rsp 00007fffff8c9228 error 4 >> >> >> Any suggestions ? >> > > Do you trust that machine's RAM? > Can you try running memtest86 for some extended period of time? > > (just to make sure it's not a hardware issue) > > Well even that it's not cheap hardware one can never be sure that it's ok. It's a production server, so I guess it has to be a night job... Thanks, Poul