Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9B2650EDD for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:44:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15472-01 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:44:41 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zen.co.za (zsn100.zen.co.za [196.23.180.100]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F67D650EF7 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:44:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from zenmail.co.za (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zen.co.za (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5O6rSBF028233; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:53:28 +0200 Received: from 196.23.181.69 (SquirrelMail authenticated user henry@zen.co.za) by zenmail.co.za with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:53:28 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <5bb1a62ac2bb9add42b96b508829526d.squirrel@zenmail.co.za> In-Reply-To: <4860970E.9070305@careerjunction.co.za> References: <4860970E.9070305@careerjunction.co.za> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:53:28 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: replication From: "Henry - Zen Search SA" To: "Adrian Moisey" Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (zen.co.za [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:53:28 +0200 (SAST) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.734 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=-1.165, FS_REPLICA=1.179, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA=0.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200806/797 X-Sequence-Number: 134326 On Tue, June 24, 2008 8:41 am, Adrian Moisey wrote: > Hi > > We have a 100GB database (16GB dumped) running on 8.2. > > Since the bandwidth in South Africa isn't that freely available it is > difficult for us to get a new copy of out DB in our office (our fastest > link in the office is 4Mbps). > > What can you recommend for me to get an up to date copy of my DB in the > office with as little transfer as possible. > > A few ideas I've been toying with are rsyncing a dump of the db, or > replication. > > Any ideas? Give Slony (http://www.slony.info/) a try - the initial replication of the entire DB takes a while, thereafter it only replicates changes (as they happen). We've been using it successfully (it has it's occasional problems like all things) for over a year now replicating across a cluster (DB is also about 100GB+). Regards Henry