Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sMr6h-0054xe-Gm for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:32:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sMr6f-00B4EJ-K3 for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:32:17 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sMr6f-00B4EB-8e for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:32:17 +0000 Received: from efreedom.netcracker.com ([198.49.86.140]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sMr6c-003PCQ-NY for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:32:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=netcracker.com; s=i; c=simple/simple; t=1719502333; h=from:subject:to:date:message-id; bh=lyRE98carIpnZIc8+ZEWRLwF4rp24b7c4+sItfIY6k8=; b=WQur0DRimcRN9nKi7MGaer9K0zcP4uTrju6Pa6QJrA0A3d8f9iT+iJkXug+76f8YoljnHF6VP+H 8nN4ZPAw+i+dsOLAE/367w93be7CVTSwKHIQMXwQ2jNcUQbhpxfW+wBnaTsHwoabU7xgysGOADHSZ 3PgbPIjZTgDT3cNmAe8qXYr7+OQUOhZb3dZ/56/L7cdM5NNpQfednhywb/VKZCVU0aPms+s9jB8VP 6HJm4DeyJ1olZQyftMO63kGKOQFPrVxd1smonR8AvpxkGC2Lv4Itcl7G9E9SnPst2Nduk8yfvW6U3 mtS6Xymyg4FWq0C/XRAVtUbPAqN3f56n/70w== From: Dhritman Roy To: "pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: dblink Future support vs FDW Thread-Topic: dblink Future support vs FDW Thread-Index: AdrIpk6ffcrS8aprS4q4yq5i3h3Uww== Disposition-Notification-To: Dhritman Roy Return-Receipt-To: Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:32:13 +0000 Message-ID: <609c8cd402e145e2af12bcfe20ac22e1@NetCracker.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_609c8cd402e145e2af12bcfe20ac22e1NetCrackercom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KSE-ServerInfo: mailgwcdc.netcracker.com, 9 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: Clean, bases: 6/27/2024 2:29:00 PM X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --_000_609c8cd402e145e2af12bcfe20ac22e1NetCrackercom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, This is my attempt to seek support at PostGreSQL. So, if I have broken any protocols/rules or violated any code of conduct th= en please do forgive and guide me. Thanks. My organization is building something which is using dblink and what we are= building shall take several months and then to be offered to a client. I just wanted to check what is the future/roadmap of dblink? Is it going to be obsolete/removed from PostGreSQL in upcoming versions? I know we can use FDW but our teams are right now considering dblink ( it s= eems it is more performant when compared to FDW ) and we obviously do not w= ant to end up in a situation where we develop something in few months and t= hen we find that the PostGreSQL support is ending with a new version. Any information/pointers related to future of dblink will be very useful fo= r us and highly appreciated. Regards ROY. ________________________________ The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entit= y to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or= privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other us= e of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons= or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receiv= ed this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from an= y computer. --_000_609c8cd402e145e2af12bcfe20ac22e1NetCrackercom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

 

This is my attempt to seek support at PostGreSQL.

So, if I have broken any protocols/rules or violated= any code of conduct then please do forgive and guide me. Thanks.

 

My organization is building something which is using= dblink and what we are building shall take several months and then to be o= ffered to a client.

I just wanted to check what is the future/roadmap of= dblink?

Is it going to be obsolete/removed from PostGreSQL i= n upcoming versions?

 

I know we can use FDW but our teams are right now co= nsidering dblink ( it seems it is more performant when compared to FDW ) an= d we obviously do not want to end up in a situation where we develop someth= ing in few months and then we find that the PostGreSQL support is ending with a new version.

 

Any information/pointers related to future of dblink= will be very useful for us and highly appreciated.

 

Regards

ROY.

 

=  

=

The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entit= y to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or= privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other us= e of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the inte= nded recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact= the sender and delete the material from any computer.  

--_000_609c8cd402e145e2af12bcfe20ac22e1NetCrackercom_--