Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tfPdG-002Fck-Ih for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:34:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tfPdF-008Ks4-Nd for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:34:53 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tfPdF-008Kle-EE for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:34:53 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tfPdD-003Bc9-0h for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:34:52 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 514KYoGO678719; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 15:34:50 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Marc Millas cc: Christophe Pettus , "pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: old OS In-reply-to: References: <662807.1738692045@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Marc Millas message dated "Tue, 04 Feb 2025 21:27:52 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <678717.1738701290.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 15:34:50 -0500 Message-ID: <678718.1738701290@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Marc Millas writes: > the data in the redhat 6.5 machine is NOT in Postgres, its in an old Oracle > instance, 4TB of it. > So I am working on a way to extract it to a file or, better to a pipe. > If I was able to get a local psql then, fine, i'll pipe the flow to it, > done.(almost...) > If no local postgres tool, as said, I will try to pipe data through the > network, > but this imply that data will be put exactly as psql, on the new machine, > will be able to 'ingest' it. I'm not really following why this requires any processing to be done locally on the old machine. You've got to shove the data over the network sooner or later, so why not sooner? regards, tom lane