Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-general-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1sL4O4-00DKKU-Jh
	for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:18:52 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-general-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1sL4O2-00CS3A-VP
	for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:18:51 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1sL4O2-00CS2q-IE
	for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:18:50 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1sL4Nv-002b5r-TT
	for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:18:49 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 45MHIgnQ788403;
	Sat, 22 Jun 2024 13:18:42 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Shaheed Haque <shaheedhaque@gmail.com>
cc: pgsql-general list <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump restores as expected on some machines and reports duplicate keys on others
In-reply-to: <CAHAc2jeB+Mzm1Kz-4Uq2CN=EGxdJO17tE0Aqm20BQUV9rGr1QQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHAc2jeB+Mzm1Kz-4Uq2CN=EGxdJO17tE0Aqm20BQUV9rGr1QQ@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Shaheed Haque <shaheedhaque@gmail.com>
	message dated "Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:01:44 +0100"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <788401.1719076722.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 13:18:42 -0400
Message-ID: <788402.1719076722@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-general.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-general-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-general>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/788402.1719076722%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Shaheed Haque <shaheedhaque@gmail.com> writes:
>    - The one difference I can think of between deployment pairs which work
>    ok, and those which fail is that the logic VM (i.e. where the psql client
>    script runs) is the use of a standard AWS ubuntu image for the OK case,
>    versus a custom AWS image for the failing case.

Please go to AWS for support for custom AWS stuff.

			regards, tom lane