Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUdmY-001ZgE-Uy for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 03:27:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUdmY-004lCY-0d for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 03:27:57 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUdmX-004lCP-ML for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 03:27:57 +0000 Received: from ageofdream.com ([45.33.21.21]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tUdmU-00067v-1L for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 03:27:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ageofdream.com; s=ageofdream; t=1736134071; bh=cPOsfkwbSvGo2kGyKyx+LTqUe874ssLRUHfdvxpghw0=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nLAyDqMPW/mPctzAqQceQdCB6Ohx+J43SoVfYcm2f0vuHhhhA0ZlgGwdrwzlwAdlu 6MyInw5iDGpx2G7swdmJLnUBCAs4Lw5fVnmJtoCsBfFbajXnUj8Ep4LcnF1U8w6pcM Q5Q5VExgKnYw5gecfuWPm9RMmwJ/1Lp1w9K9IxAaAWbw8qImxB6x/SOZWEOcMSSQmn FeUIWFz9dLooaN5SrCSkw5pL5rWtJqEUAUF5xLYNp79owaKpgKvVXaQptNarocOKZU U/+mOLrxpww+EHttRXPTeCgzToCROHL0le+YY0iiwu+3F2hHElKjs6spmKTceBJqTm ixRzZRwYWrDGw== Received: from [192.168.1.7] (unknown [72.255.194.227]) by ageofdream.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCFCA27888 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:27:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <79bce27fc173da9a8ff60e14ff438b0e0ac17bc1.camel@ageofdream.com> Subject: Re: Questions about the Debian Package version of pgAdmin From: Nick To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 22:27:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <76354c477f2636a93d891528b66c5b8c6d6b1db5.camel@ageofdream.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on ageofdream.com List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Sun, 2025-01-05 at 22:18 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 7:27=E2=80=AFPM Nick wrote= : > >=20 > > I have some questions about the > > pgAdmin Debian package version. > >=20 > > 1. If we're using the pgAdmin DEB repo, will `apt-update` always > > update > > pgAdmin to the latest major version? ie. Will we be doing an > > upgrade > > every four weeks? > >=20 >=20 > Debian's Stable repos never=C2=A0(well, very very rarely) upgrade the > version.=C2=A0 It's always bug fixes, and why Stable software can get > soooo old. > =C2=A0 >=20 This was in reference to the PgAdmin repository, not the official Debian package repository. I didn't know if the PgAdmin repo maintainers followed the same rule of one major version of PgAdmin per version of Debian, or if the PgAdmin repo was always the latest version, since PgAdmin only supports rolling releases.