Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-general-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1so9wJ-008jvz-4l
	for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 23:06:28 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-general-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1so9wI-004BNi-OS
	for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 23:06:26 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <xof@thebuild.com>)
	id 1so9wI-004BNU-BY
	for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 23:06:26 +0000
Received: from smtp67.iad3b.emailsrvr.com ([146.20.161.67])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <xof@thebuild.com>)
	id 1so9wB-000XRF-EU
	for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 23:06:24 +0000
X-Auth-ID: xof@thebuild.com
Received: by smtp1.relay.iad3b.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: xof-AT-thebuild.com) with ESMTPSA id 91EBD60265;
	Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:06:18 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
Subject: Re: Overlapping values (?) in multi-column partitioned tables
From: Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>
In-Reply-To: <c32540af9cb7a51196754f6a5d6ce920b9dd74cb.camel@cybertec.at>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:05:47 -0700
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7A1E70B8-D213-4A5D-88AD-8AD634A10576@thebuild.com>
References: <2FAC43EB-7E04-476A-BEBE-39CDBCA0EDCC@thebuild.com>
 <c32540af9cb7a51196754f6a5d6ce920b9dd74cb.camel@cybertec.at>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
X-Classification-ID: 8911b0a2-bfaa-4929-9253-22323bbb4868-1-1
List-Id: <pgsql-general.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-general-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-general>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7A1E70B8-D213-4A5D-88AD-8AD634A10576%40thebuild.com>
Precedence: bulk



> On Sep 10, 2024, at 15:57, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> =
wrote:
> So the upper limit of the first partition is strictly bigger than the =
lower end
> of the second partition.
>=20
> "record" types have the same lexicographical sorting order as ORDER BY =
clauses.

Ah, OK, got it.  I was thinking of them as a points on a plane, which =
was misleading.  Thanks!=