Feedback-ID: ie0a040ee:Fastmail
Message-ID: <7d03be7f-9d20-4285-9342-af1d51435b5a@eisentraut.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 14:55:53 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_LISTAGG_=C3=A0_la_Oracle_in_PostgreSQL?=
To: Pierre Forstmann <pierre.forstmann@gmail.com>,
 "pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
References: <de6c5d45-7ce9-42bd-9528-97fdf4ffa0e4@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
In-Reply-To: <de6c5d45-7ce9-42bd-9528-97fdf4ffa0e4@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7d03be7f-9d20-4285-9342-af1d51435b5a%40eisentraut.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 09.03.26 21:21, Pierre Forstmann wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I can write a LISTAGG aggregate for:
> 
> create table emp(deptno numeric, ename text);
> 
> SELECT deptno, LISTAGG(ename, ','::text ORDER BY ename) AS employees 
> FROM   emp GROUP BY deptno ORDER BY deptno;
> 
> I would like to know if is possible to create an aggregate LISTAGG that 
> would work like in Oracle:
> 
> SELECT deptno,
>         listagg(ename, ',') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY ename) AS employees
> FROM emp
> GROUP BY deptno
> ORDER BY deptno;
> 
> I failed and IA also failed. Claude says:
> 
> It is not possible to exactly replicate listagg(ename, ',') WITHIN GROUP 
> (ORDER BY ename) as a custom PostgreSQL aggregate
> because PostgreSQL strictly forbids ungrouped columns as direct 
> arguments to ordered-set aggregates.
> 
> Do you agree ?

One of the reasons that PostgreSQL hasn't implemented LISTAGG is that it 
is a misdesign.  It uses ordered-set aggregate syntax even
though it is not very similar to the other ordered-set aggregates.
Its syntax should be more similar to ARRAY_AGG or
JSON_ARRAYAGG, for example.  But it's too late to fix the standard on this.