public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
To: Wim Rouquart <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Index (primary key) corrupt?
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 08:37:26 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKAnmmLsxdt51sp-w0JxMi0haGXHFKD2pXURfOSOa5iVzjni4w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AS2PR05MB1075477BA334D4DA262AD75BFEF16A@AS2PR05MB10754.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<AS2PR05MB107541E760AECB8639BB968B5EF63A@AS2PR05MB10754.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<AS2PR05MB1075432E74AF2FA975B02519AEF61A@AS2PR05MB10754.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<AS2PR05MB107546BEE7B8092148A0B51A0EF61A@AS2PR05MB10754.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<AS2PR05MB107546C1B04FC4B3CCF32E60CEF7DA@AS2PR05MB10754.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<DB5PR05MB107646FFE78759D1D5431F802EF7AA@DB5PR05MB10764.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<AS2PR05MB1075476F648651C8CC02D8048EF79A@AS2PR05MB10754.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
<CAKAnmmLsxdt51sp-w0JxMi0haGXHFKD2pXURfOSOa5iVzjni4w@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/9/26 8:24 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 10:12 AM Wim Rouquart <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> I already saw finding the actual cause as a 'lost cause' as these
> things tend to happen, however what bothers me most is that a tool
> like amcheck which is supposed to find corruption also shows up with
> no result.
>
>
> Well, no, these things really should not happen. :)
>
> It may be too late, but it would be real interesting to see this query
> both before and after the REINDEX:
>
> select * from pg_index where indrelid = 'bcf_work_type'::regclass and
> indisprimary;
Déjà vu :)
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKAnmmK9uKAcerhseNg6FSDOnMWmivM5ctUiTAdc1kobq94Dqw%40mail.gma...
This post in answer:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AS2PR05MB107549DDE42DC0B8E31CB52BFEF90A%40AS2PR05MB10754.eurpr...
would seem to indicate that is not the issue.
>
> An incorrect indrelid is one way I can think of as to how pg_dump would
> miss it, but that wouldn't explain why reindex would subsequently fix it.
>
> Cheers,
> Greg
>
--
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Index (primary key) corrupt?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox