public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
To: nikhil raj <[email protected]>
To: pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org <[email protected]>
Cc: NIKITA PATEL <[email protected]>
Cc: Patel Khushbu <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:10:06 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG1ps1xvnTZceKK24OUfMKLPvDP2vjT-d+F2AOCWbw_v3KeEgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALNXOfqDr5jVRZHThyXyNftDuezjxOJB1mqw=4x1T8YBibi6uw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAG1ps1w61XD1LxUf3EBCZ=VR3S_orRj_dk6cxmO5KusBVyrgMg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAvG1pChk3W9MWkK-_JPyUdThSoJhv4MueH5i8cZS2T_HUP5dA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAG1ps1xvnTZceKK24OUfMKLPvDP2vjT-d+F2AOCWbw_v3KeEgg@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/26/24 14:49, nikhil raj wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've encountered a noticeable difference in execution time and query
> execution plan row counts between PostgreSQL 13 and PostgreSQL 16 when
> running a query on |information_schema| tables. Surprisingly, PostgreSQL
> 16 is performing slower than PostgreSQL 13.
Did you run ANALYZE on the Postgres 16 instance?
> *4PostgreSQL 13.14 (PostgreSQL 13.14 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by
> gcc 11.4.0, 64-bit)*
> Execution plan: PG13.14 Execution Plan
> <https://explain.dalibo.com/plan/ag1a62a9d47dg29d;
>
> *PostgreSQL 16.4 (PostgreSQL 16.4 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by
> gcc 11.4.0, 64-bit)*
> Execution plan: PG16.4 Execution Plan
> <https://explain.dalibo.com/plan/4c66fdfbf2hf9ed2;
Use:
https://explain.depesz.com/
It is easier to follow it's output.
>
>
> Has anyone else experienced similar behavior or could provide insights
> into why PostgreSQL 16 might be slower for this query? Any advice or
> suggestions for optimization would be greatly appreciated.
Yes when ANALYZE was not run on a new instance.
>
> Thank you!
>
> NOTE:- PFA the raw file of explain and analyze below.
>
>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]
view thread (22+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox