public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

Re: Arrays vs separate tables
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Re: Arrays vs separate tables
@ 2025-10-20 15:06  Rich Shepard <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: Rich Shepard @ 2025-10-20 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: [email protected]

On Mon, 20 Oct 2025, Michał Kłeczek wrote:

> Do you have any means to make sure you didn’t enter the same number for
> two different companies then?

Michal,

Yes. New companies are added one-at-a-time. In the 28 years I've used
postgres I've not had any such issues.

Regards,

Rich






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Arrays vs separate tables
@ 2025-10-20 15:41  Michał Kłeczek <[email protected]>
  parent: Rich Shepard <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Michał Kłeczek @ 2025-10-20 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rich Shepard <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]


> On 20 Oct 2025, at 17:06, Rich Shepard <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025, Michał Kłeczek wrote:
> 
>> Do you have any means to make sure you didn’t enter the same number for
>> two different companies then?
> 
> Michal,
> 
> Yes. New companies are added one-at-a-time. In the 28 years I've used
> postgres I've not had any such issues.

Ok, if manual integrity validation works for you then arrays are fine.


—
Michal





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-20 15:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-20 15:06 Re: Arrays vs separate tables Rich Shepard <[email protected]>
2025-10-20 15:41 ` Michał Kłeczek <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox