Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vCZ0Q-00Fikb-8D for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 07:48:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vCYzQ-002c45-Uc for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 07:47:03 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vCYzQ-002c3x-J5 for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 07:47:03 +0000 Received: from mail.hjp.at ([212.17.106.138] helo=rorschach.hjp.at) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vCYzN-0047yW-1C for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 07:47:03 +0000 Received: by rorschach.hjp.at (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A59A58240; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:47:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:47:00 +0200 From: "Peter J. Holzer" To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Download statistics Message-ID: <7pwwv34tsim6ehsu4bosy3ol7ctmf2blig6rgwo7kq5ilaidua@miqogysnbey7> Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h6a6azi7d3cffgza" Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --h6a6azi7d3cffgza Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Download statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 The discussion about people avoiding .0 releases over in the "Index corruption ..." thread made me wonder how the distribution really looks like. How many people do install X.0, X.1, etc. for each major version X? Download statistics are of course quite noisy but I think they should at least show the trends. Do you have any and would you mind publishing them? My guess is that the downloads will start low for .0 then increase for some time (because most people who installed X.y will then upgrade to X.y+1, at least if they are using apt or dnf). At some time after the next major release it will start to decline again (because people will now use the new major release for fresh installs and also start to upgrade existing installations) but with a very long tail. hjp --=20 _ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality. |_|_) | | | | | hjp@hjp.at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!" --h6a6azi7d3cffgza Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEETtJbRjyPwVTYGJ5k8g5IURL+KF0FAmj8gG4ACgkQ8g5IURL+ KF3bfQ//b2AAw7vqnVjkJwZhfxqx9m3CxJkDgfHSX1DUC5N3krUuzO+3Dp4mtL73 k9V9S+8IEj6V9zERac3fK12euifYNtiq9X+vMmfsyoEwkhtRMY4++2yhrjH3xDld tRJ9I9jdlUeiNB8WwussuGLmw5PiAbWtxW4OAblKfGHWS4o9PItX/P5XgYAvE+dE cp5qw1PSnLqLy/mVTWmwnC/vqVS1YfSUmWnPspSOE46coevYVsKSDcWjQvJC7I24 XOQwh54KfUrocMGWMAeVWu1k0FJUmpZkpW9xAhXE2PApHOqOrL7CE14SRUE3EzGf +Q/+vRMWoaORNXQ7BI/TvRLyuuHVkh1XH5M8IniAY8+q8AGmDlBFGDnWtGoG4ATP pTSQqSSHaZXc0cj6U97xInRAx/Hr5b+8l39Uvv8us5daBkP+tdb3NYXAhi+24aF/ 84cXMxwk36lKaeOysYOzQUZ2PR2S4l41G9yGok4RLW1lQ/UydjtsnvuRaQwEPbiq 3fEug4rUMKLNc7KNSZ/8jdTBOg+tEtBGzZgGHNuBo9eo/yeY8865iRr/wZVKEorU 35vjHKqiXxPhhnlUujzOSxCRT+L8P/f2njv7LOs0QYBflHC3C4Vpzd7RP1Vctk9g oN9gyyQEBbkp7kdlk0VbOyltyIQXGvsiJOlmYw5Pf3S3GPmKuaQ= =hHkE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h6a6azi7d3cffgza--