Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vx8Dx-00GxsX-3C for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:42:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vx8Dw-002Pjj-06 for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:42:32 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vx8Dv-002Pja-2F for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:42:32 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vx8Du-000000003gu-1buE for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:42:31 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 622IgQGD862278; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 13:42:27 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: "David G. Johnston" cc: "pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Documentation weirdness In-reply-to: References: <4mdo74l7xtv7yezgtpn3okojofyf6ihqttjm67cwngyiadgjf2@c6aqv4ruxrqp> Comments: In-reply-to "David G. Johnston" message dated "Mon, 02 Mar 2026 11:36:09 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <862276.1772476946.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 13:42:26 -0500 Message-ID: <862277.1772476946@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk "David G. Johnston" writes: > On Monday, March 2, 2026, Peter J. Holzer wrote: >> Would it be possible to set (column constraint) and (table constraint) >> in the normal body font instead of monospace? That would make it clearer >> that these phrases aren't part of the syntax but descriptive. > Not sure, but I don’t like that as the sole solution anyway. Too subtle. Agreed, but we could/should do it along with modifying the text. I thought your addition of "variant" was a good idea. I didn't look closely at the rest of your diff. regards, tom lane