public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Ayush Vatsa <[email protected]>
Cc: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 14:57:43 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACX+KaMiZaFWVxYzZ_Lw-EBKgiO5GEBHmHREqs=GDpM88hRqdw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACX+KaMz2ZoOojh0nQ6QNBYx8Ak1Dkoko=D4FSb80BYW+o8CHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAKFQuwZ+EsCJHmBVdHeJ2XUWUBSGtN8k2icrX2hrPR=m7sLNGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CACX+KaMiZaFWVxYzZ_Lw-EBKgiO5GEBHmHREqs=GDpM88hRqdw@mail.gmail.com>

Ayush Vatsa <[email protected]> writes:
>> As it stands, a superuser can prewarm an index (because she bypasses all
>> privilege checks including this one), but nobody else can.

> That's not fully true. Any role can prewarm an index if the role has the
> correct privileges.

Ah, right.  An index will have null pg_class.relacl, which'll be
interpreted as "owner has all rights", so it will work for the
table owner too.  Likely this explains the lack of prior complaints.
It's still a poor design IMO.

			regards, tom lane

view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox