public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Rich Shepard <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Arrays vs separate tables
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 05:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pyh2kcisxwrhzz255gaiaawo5yubirdifzsfvz3okqcjeaaqqr@6lq5n6idswg7>
References: <[email protected]>
<pyh2kcisxwrhzz255gaiaawo5yubirdifzsfvz3okqcjeaaqqr@6lq5n6idswg7>
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> * Simplicity: If a set of values is always fetched together and updated
> together, you might as well treat it as a unit and not split it over
> multiple tables
> The second may be relevant for you. If you always display and edit the
> phone numbers of a contact together and your frontend makes it easier to
> edit an array than a subset of rows from a table, you might just stuff
> them into a table and ignore "purity".
Peter,
Thank you. That's my use case.
Regards,
Rich
view thread (8+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Arrays vs separate tables
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox