Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t17F3-00Enod-Vx for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:51:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t17F1-006Dvn-V3 for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:51:20 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t17F1-006DvZ-Jw for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:51:19 +0000 Received: from smtp94.ord1d.emailsrvr.com ([184.106.54.94]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t17Ev-001O66-RX for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:51:19 +0000 X-Auth-ID: xof@thebuild.com Received: by smtp20.relay.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: xof-AT-thebuild.com) with ESMTPSA id 0BD3AC012E; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 12:51:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51\)) Subject: Re: What are best practices wrt passwords? From: Christophe Pettus In-Reply-To: <186766.1729097245@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:50:41 -0700 Cc: Bruce Momjian , mbork@mbork.pl, Dominique Devienne , pgsql-general@postgresql.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87o73kgzkd.fsf@mbork.pl> <87frowggzq.fsf@mbork.pl> <186766.1729097245@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51) X-Classification-ID: f8acf0ee-e4b5-4e42-bf3d-b95eac4b3eb8-1-1 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On Oct 16, 2024, at 09:47, Tom Lane wrote: > I believe it depends on your platform --- some BSDen are pretty > permissive about this, if memory serves. On a Linux box it seems > to work for processes owned by yourself even if you're not superuser. I just tried it on an (admittedly kind of old) Ubuntu system and MacOS = 14, and it looks like shows everything owned by everyone, even from a = non-sudoer user.=