public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Igor Korot <[email protected]>
To: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-general <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Does included columns part of the PK
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 22:33:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+FnnTzXgAU8k2LxPeiOZpfKjOyM-vutsaRV-sFHv431-64gSA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FnnTyH7Hp2tO03UnLE_cpZ_rerdttV02_gVBxM5jiz3Z2GSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+FnnTz7+dbyk5Gn2iM-eo1Xvfax15yjBevmCCfvo0-UVW1K7Q@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAKFQuwYswndGOm6vnsoNSTWHEC5d29bvYokymtDEY_cyW54FEQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+FnnTyFVn4Ebx9kP-5vooZwpATwV5Euc8Nt6TGmEuR6oDYd9A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+FnnTwLvp1wweqWJkw1+sg4x+pM_oGVmfc-3TaPpE_557=A_A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+FnnTx5WZeYwg-OFwvbipvHRJP263UP8EVNY0aGMu6E_XuKsQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+FnnTw+HhguiTO27hzTUTU6uRBY_wRRwB=xT+7=t_0CdrCsoA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CA+FnnTxh0ZvsaKvkpg7OLQBVhhicsv2u+uk9d0jf+qmF5q=YTw@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+FnnTzXK876siRuPhqav59SmzTSZUYmo9vGqffRn8g0Vr9f8Q@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+FnnTyH7Hp2tO03UnLE_cpZ_rerdttV02_gVBxM5jiz3Z2GSg@mail.gmail.com>
For all involved and interested:
The issue with ODBC driver has been fixed and will
be part of the next release.
Ref: https://github.com/postgresql-interfaces/psqlodbc/issues/170.
Thank you.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 6:11 PM Igor Korot <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Adrian,,
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 5:44 PM Adrian Klaver <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/16/26 4:38 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> > > Adrian,
> > >
> > > Most important - do you agree that those fields should not be in this
> > > recordset?
> >
> > I don't see anything here:
> >
> > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/odbc/reference/syntax/sqlprimarykeys-function?view=sql-server-...
> >
> > that says they should be returned. Though the above also says:
> >
> > " Additional columns beyond column 6 (PK_NAME) can be defined by the
> > driver."
> >
> > That is not the case here, where additional rows are used. However it
> > does allow for more information to be supplied.
> >
> > My purely un-expert analysis is, no the extra rows should not be there.
>
> Thx for confirming.
>
> I already forwarded the email with the query results over to ODBC list.
>
> Hopefully someone can come back soon.
>
> Are you reading that list as well? If not I will update this thread
> with the results.
>
> Thank you.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> >
> > --
> > Adrian Klaver
> > [email protected]
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Does included columns part of the PK
In-Reply-To: <CA+FnnTzXgAU8k2LxPeiOZpfKjOyM-vutsaRV-sFHv431-64gSA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox