public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: David Rowley <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Staubo <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Use of inefficient index in the presence of dead tuples
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 20:10:56 +1200
Message-ID: <CAApHDvrrXUZ+u--+hv02XH=L8U=mZLbkk605ueVOohaOYcoFVQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 12:53, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> It would be interesting to see a non-artificial example that took
> into account when the last auto-vacuum and auto-analyze really
> happened, so we could see if there's any less-fragile way of
> dealing with this situation.
I think we need to find a way to give some additional preference to
using indexes with more keys matching to quals.
David
view thread (8+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Use of inefficient index in the presence of dead tuples
In-Reply-To: <CAApHDvrrXUZ+u--+hv02XH=L8U=mZLbkk605ueVOohaOYcoFVQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox