MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ashish Mukherjee <ashish.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 21:25:27 +0530
Message-ID: <CACgMzfwSDRF+kQr59h0-xGUobCeFZxwVzE_tUxF18DkVb+vuDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Enquiry about TDE with PgSQL
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000086747706410c4c02"
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACgMzfwSDRF%2BkQr59h0-xGUobCeFZxwVzE_tUxF18DkVb%2BvuDQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

--00000000000086747706410c4c02
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hello,

Thank you to the group members for the responses to my previous questions
about TDE problems with PgSQL 17.

I would like to enquire that based on the anecdotal experience of group
members, which TDE solution works best for PgSQL 17 databases. The scenario
I have is of a large number of tables (15-20K) and some tables with 100M
tuples each. The total database size is 4TB.

I understand there may be variations and specific testing is required,
however high-level pointers and feedback would be valuable.

Regards,
Ashish

--00000000000086747706410c4c02
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hello,<div><br></div><div>Thank you to the group members f=
or the responses to my previous questions about TDE problems with PgSQL 17.=
</div><div><br></div><div>I would like to enquire that based on the anecdot=
al experience of group members, which TDE solution works best for PgSQL 17 =
databases. The=C2=A0scenario I=C2=A0have is of a large number of tables (15=
-20K) and some tables with 100M tuples each. The total database size is 4TB=
.</div><div><br></div><div>I understand there may be variations and specifi=
c testing is required, however high-level pointers and feedback would be va=
luable.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Ashish</div></div>

--00000000000086747706410c4c02--