public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: yudhi s <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Query performance issue
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:57:24 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEzWdqe79h3o8K8KoC9hky28no9ysYutHvK22G_M-TxaLa5HXg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAEzWdqfeaLov=e3Dk_wMpzh0yWhGcVJhundmL=QL1X_KqG_Jfw@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 3:06 AM Peter J. Holzer <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2024-10-16 23:20:36 +0530, yudhi s wrote:
> > Below is a query which is running for ~40 seconds.
> [...]
> > In the execution path below , the line number marked in bold are the top
> lines
> > for the IN and NOT IN subquery evaluation and they are showing "Actual
> time" as
> >  Approx ~9 seconds and ~8 seconds and they seems to be summed up and the
> top
> > lines showing it to be ~19 seconds. Then onwards it keeps on increasing
> with
> > other "nested loop" joins.
> >
> > Note:- This query is running on a MYSQL 8.0 database. So I'm wondering
> if there
> > is any mysql list similar to Oracle list , in which i can share this
> issue?
>
> The execution plan looks like a postgresql execution plan, not a mysql
> execution plan. Did you run this query on postgresql? That may be
> interesting for comparison purposese, but ultimately it is useless: You
> won't get mysql to work like postgresql, and any tips to speed up this
> query on postgresql (which is all you can expect on a postgresql mailing
> list) probably won't work on mysql.
>
>
>

Agreed. Postgres and mysql may have differences in how the optimizer is
interpreting the stats and coming up with the execution oath. However, I
was looking if the query can be written efficiently by tweaking the current
logic. It's actually spending the majority of the time doing the "IN" and
"NOT IN" evaluation and in that it's using the same exact subquery for the
"UNION ALL" . And the overall execution time is summation of the IN and NOT
IN clause evaluation. So  I was thinking of a better way of writing the
same logically.

view thread (4+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Query performance issue
  In-Reply-To: <CAEzWdqe79h3o8K8KoC9hky28no9ysYutHvK22G_M-TxaLa5HXg@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox