Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uqtIs-00Ek8e-7f for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 13:01:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uqtIr-00662h-KZ for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 13:01:34 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uqtIr-00662Z-AU for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 13:01:33 +0000 Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uqtIp-001xIY-2x for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 13:01:33 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-435de764e08so3216600b6e.1 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 06:01:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1756213289; x=1756818089; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=MV0fPV15mhOFCoFNKKYannLo62iAomu8mrMAMgKlO04=; b=Z4Rsq0zNbBrVGNAO9tmlfn65l+NCnwVuL13fAjaKO7PyKGXkYFrC5mYLU8iqWf6dx+ 0Od6nGPLKFOuSlbMgAZ0hiySj8Z4WHatQ0zSQuhF9OD9pOBQpdsSmb9UKmb0PmVg6pVn zpbJsW1Vtd8plesgTT2wTedVWt/dXJe/7jaB6ySTI38nNPPH+1lQ+4hq5a+dUlJpAzhB byQoMEziZkuyGwuVGBY3oD1TtLiqM8sPKfCbig4swDV2oRo2tUQrfUGw+hgiLeYlstK8 eVnGh+3vr3Yz8/0FTT208BSd0uOA6s9TXSzIJowpyB9aOQhv+SJSSqmadYCND5Vfepyt HvPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1756213289; x=1756818089; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MV0fPV15mhOFCoFNKKYannLo62iAomu8mrMAMgKlO04=; b=wq12p7bxfBd/f6Jz5/HgYEkaldEMfCG98So33DeKTsokIH0Rzbdd7mTAqswP7s7U2c vsc7nCJgVsVQ8xznjS7wllZ4e1Nj0Fa025mnqNi3dZyeHgUXCBfwPF5IWJ+WVJvlLoCO cTHWMdpPZSGWIK86mOe8qEisf34cRcJV5OZ+GnvY1G2aO3FclQK8NrA4RS58Ozr+5eXg eG28wI4UN+5Oj/7i42zsULoB474Otoh+ZBPTwDCSngpxESt583AYnH+nL3es1abUdlY/ lKcVF8H1zKQLbj6ZWy+RosHbeZ7af8Rwv/w08kI+l/h+vpAWHPNTa8rL8Pdfec/NH/DR RG8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwTxMmIYUxZvzvOiAMwrt0ZtQ/N887rt+BsIQvi8l5lmrxM2Fu0 LI44HG730oSeT7ptXWt1DJ5dCe14/ecGScltg18SuCRNjtQvKzMWGq9c0RaE0aqsuwmUbckyN5e HeJhuRjTgP5KIyKWz7EFquSeZrqzLWwBtpA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsIndx6F1QMQ8RK3Q6ZMHzUEh0C7QPMgmtxXuVixvVXJwcH4ZP3DcUYfc8zoOq 29cJZtm7/3XIJmahkaOaUnFNN7S9anxcMiFpdK8BgMhNuR/cuOqN3uJ2Fdu+CD4WRw9FW1hNT9M 6DnHl4le/jZPSkJl4had+QC+wAVVX27zEa28vHaOS+a1OUbtSPnCmVVWN5MQ12ss0HTJA54nyKg aIyBgTu5g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHSpvFHxS1eOyZSVEVpDX8P3lbyLVBLI+8k03nG0I0j7xYz0XO9PiYnrE6eiU09Qxd9zp6+lVkpPjQcz8Wjho8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1883:b0:40a:d1ec:703c with SMTP id 5614622812f47-437852488d7mr7012395b6e.23.1756213289169; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 06:01:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <185dd861-4e5a-47c0-9f2e-84dfa8a406ca@postgrespro.ru> <26239cd6-a13d-4137-9f1d-61e18c4cf0e6@aklaver.com> In-Reply-To: From: Dominique Devienne Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:01:16 +0200 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXxx7oLtPsDyj7BGqJ1hOPhjB6KXAiU1xDQWL6AFlZYeZn5OyMNcGGqIEHU Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISABLE TRIGGER doc wrong? To: Ron Johnson Cc: "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 2:54=E2=80=AFPM Ron Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 3:01=E2=80=AFAM Dominique Devienne wrote: >> ERROR: permission denied: "RI_ConstraintTrigger_c_1226298044" is a >> (yes, that's a large OID... For a 1 year old DB) > > PG's OID allocation of "user-land" OIDs doesn't start at 16384 anymore. This is a 17 cluster. So not even 1 year old then. So getting to 1.2B OIDs in 10 months, doesn't bode well for the longevity of that cluster. But we're getting OT here. This is not a "production" server, lots of CIs and manual testing there.