MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFCRh-8NwJd0jq6P=R3qhHyqU7hw0BTor3W0SvUcii24et+zAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <7132f28c-1437-4723-a363-c19b99a33bec@aklaver.com> <CAFCRh--TsbUwg3LQ06USKQSzSm8S+dRAN13_haXvkUmiOVbbbg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFCRh--TsbUwg3LQ06USKQSzSm8S+dRAN13_haXvkUmiOVbbbg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 17:45:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFCRh-_NmVAWUWyK0p4whpUnCtjVhavThRgnP8L9uyw=ZmEfvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFCRh-_NmVAWUWyK0p4whpUnCtjVhavThRgnP8L9uyw%3DZmEfvQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 5:31=E2=80=AFPM Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.=
com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 5:12=E2=80=AFPM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklav=
er.com> wrote:
> > On 9/4/25 08:03, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > > But now, we've ascertain that a particular test is:
> > > OK with 16.9 and 17.5 (we cannot test on beta2 anymore)
> > > KO with 16.10 and 17.6 (and beta3 too, released at the same time)
>
> > How did you move from one version to the other?
>
> We first upgraded in place. Broke that test.

We're still naive I guess. And didn't expect a minor upgrade to break us...

Given this mishap, we'll do the reverse from now on.
Install fresh clusters for the new versions (minor or not), and see
what happens.
So we don't "advance" our main/primary (testing) clusters until
"issues are resolved".