MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFCRh-9byA_kmskbL5duYsjqZG3N78KuvY6TkiT3KuRo27=4QQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <3070156.1730828552@sss.pgh.pa.us> <CAFCRh-9TeQ=tWiMDKmSZBW3JxY60Nn6Mf4AnWohixKQFOk7+TA@mail.gmail.com>
 <3075665.1730831121@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <3075665.1730831121@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:29:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFCRh-_du9nVxpFVc9WV62TsMK=7+NTWnCG3K8QLmOrQ4Xs0WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Switching to NOINHERIT user triggers #XX000 error
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFCRh-_du9nVxpFVc9WV62TsMK%3D7%2BNTWnCG3K8QLmOrQ4Xs0WQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 7:25=E2=80=AFPM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 6:42=E2=80=AFPM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wro=
te:
> >> This is probably a bug, at least to the extent that we don't like
> >> XX000 errors to be easily reachable, so please let us know what
> >> you find out.
>
> > Finding where the error is thrown is easy, it's when I'm doing that gra=
nt.
> > But the code creates two larguish schemas before that and several ROLEs=
,
> > so it's not easy to share.
>
> Really, we need a self-contained example case to do anything
> about this.  Maybe you could anonymize the object names in
> your test?

I understand, thanks. I might be able to do that. We'll see. --DD