Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u7Boz-00CFWI-6T for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:29:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u7Box-00DVne-CJ for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:29:48 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u7Box-00DVnW-1U for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:29:47 +0000 Received: from mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1u7Bou-001OgT-2d for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:29:47 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e643f0933afso4625090276.1 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 04:29:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1745321384; x=1745926184; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=n1X6daJF0q5RWRVJoy+3rNDQglh2UWHFxRFIEcs9ZLc=; b=KOxUG4it5cUkTmY4Bty3s0Cd12kReAcQnVLWBW0/Qykw/pFMVGvIzsMLtZRxZ0+YBL XklSl8SUmVULD1OycYBnOyayjIehund5O/eigyMYXIKtjcZV0GxlQGsH66NGIxn4BKTy hD1kBsmOVlq2H3hODZwmSH91k2lGnCBhaDP9lm2QYRByIsxoISfhlOn/9Di8FejYi/aw 5cYgVDP9tB2HcIiczgplNNuEu4uXur0Lv6CXeNdutpNe6Lg0W/64MA445naIOqbSxRmu oosU1pYRMROAIuXqdvklM3R/Q/9MN8RlFJUNgb2rxXi696nnmJVm9B8/WvgfgZe9BdU+ I0Yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745321384; x=1745926184; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=n1X6daJF0q5RWRVJoy+3rNDQglh2UWHFxRFIEcs9ZLc=; b=e5Hv+jIkFo5uNjSbfkMETMFp9YPnxyXUSKvsO8ghINm4+5LF0gd2Kj43Yzcg05rk93 FT3LFp6tnpWJaUtx55H2qNouEU/Y0CLTztNN7pZC+HK5ClajP3gHWAR9eITnhgtcpd2p E6BBP+zzZFEFCHFpDw0Wzliub8uMVdUvSC6VRo4y0WjNYW9jvmSR8E2rgJ52yISzOzmZ CD1VMgeCbhACvMkayeNrP//DwhVmju/KRD3xz8N3+EyZweU6IqvR+yZAO8+0w7N/TLST T20RlotnZZ4KA7AdpfEhoh46YMjcAnBe1EEcVx+5Zc0TU5HrZ6yx/WwnW+TpdJxdDMvO gVYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw8TjmgBncbTYP3BfO+ZB8ZlasgwDqKmkmRcX3ocxw/gzDrjwHy LACctY4a4Fkjsh8cCs8i3M3YB0kpHhInaGsOSWjVs0032pT4fbbH+cVwJ4MQQrj6rNSrYg7/IHO jEHUIuRyQPNyVosQnrRPevC/YTGQl8WKM X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsOdiPKUIt2VLaw3rvBWJcWgwo0DcW6emFE5ggYGVKtnxp5BAqGtJ8bTYxsOnB CkjSpDQKT6fJzDaM/A8Qp5XtBaB35loOb6jc+KJYNDKAvgT6+Pkjv6d3sdY04N4izlwI6q7K0AD cOtZ4eeGLJjYX78Y6y1/vj X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG5TGOtYNS8Z8tg4l5eo8LTPunPbV/DTG4QaPvo928Z7Jz4fuCTCNAUV+PkVcg98WUlZ/UXyg0w/LuiAqNj1yo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:e11:b0:e5b:32f5:e38c with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e729492222bmr21667361276.8.1745321383948; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 04:29:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: chandan Kumar Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:59:31 +0530 X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUErj2r-f5rqETymocWmaNXcq7ADZLpJyG5pac_6NtcRKlEn2lsynVySOJk Message-ID: Subject: SQL transactions executing from VMSS To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001bfb5806335c4df3" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --0000000000001bfb5806335c4df3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Team, Greetings! Kindly help in below situation, where in I see slowness in response time while I do testing running SQL transaction in batches from VMSS to postgres database in flexible server(PaaS) 14.17 version. VMSS to IaaS(postgres db on ubuntu) is faster than VMSs to PaaS. 14 version is same on both the system. response size is same but response time is almost 2.5x more on PaaS. I see dynatrace is showing more time is on waiting time. Query plan is same on both the system. If i run single sql transaction from pg admin it is executing in same time. what can cause this slowness, any idea please. -- *With warm regards* * Chandan* --0000000000001bfb5806335c4df3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Team,
Greet= ings!

Kindly help in below situation, where in I s= ee slowness in response time while I do testing running SQL transaction in = batches from VMSS to postgres database in flexible server(PaaS) 14.17 versi= on. VMSS to IaaS(postgres db on ubuntu) is faster than VMSs to PaaS. 14 ver= sion is same on both the system. response size is same but response time is= almost 2.5x more on PaaS. I see dynatrace is showing more time is on waiti= ng time. Query plan is same on both the system. If i run single sql transac= tion from pg admin it is executing in same time.
=C2=A0what can c= ause this slowness, any idea please.
--
With warm regards
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Chandan
--0000000000001bfb5806335c4df3--