public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Joseph Hammerman <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: SQL: Chaining versus Pipelining
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:26:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHs7QM8VJ1pAYR7zdJ9GwbXhVbJEUnLw+sM=bMNNrXFMvaji8g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi PgSQL general mailing lists,

In Postgres Weekly, I encountered this
<https://bugfactory.io/articles/using-transaction-chaining-to-reduce-server-round-trips/;
interesting article. The documentation
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/plpgsql-transactions.html; on the
use of AND CHAIN is here. A co-worker is interested in the difference
between chaining and using the pipelining
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/libpq-pipeline-mode.html; syntax.

They look pretty similar to me; it could be that one implementation is PG
specific and not part of the SQL standard or something. Can anyone shed any
light for us?

Thanks in advance for any assistance anyone can provide,
Joseph Hammerman

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: SQL: Chaining versus Pipelining
  In-Reply-To: <CAHs7QM8VJ1pAYR7zdJ9GwbXhVbJEUnLw+sM=bMNNrXFMvaji8g@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox