public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
To: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-general <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:25:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKAnmm+v7Rby=QKs-TCDjr42tjazcndJOPw_6pZVFadU7v9rWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAApHDvrsbj-hCUhB=N+Hbzm2e0a5AjCe6MbB3KMgpDEF15q5CQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKAnmm+tbPMdP8ccrJ-o_LVgC6ADdOEoh2=J+zyWNLab6B3+_Q@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvrsbj-hCUhB=N+Hbzm2e0a5AjCe6MbB3KMgpDEF15q5CQ@mail.gmail.com>
> But to what degree exactly should that be allowed?
Somewhat ironically, here's a distinction chatgpt and I came up with:
LLM-generated content: Content where the substantial part of the text is
directly created by LLMs without significant human alteration or editing.
Human-edited or reviewed content: Content that has been substantially
revised, corrected, or enhanced by a human after initial generation by
LLMs. This includes using spell and grammar checking, manual edits for
clarity or style, and content that reflects significant human input beyond
the original LLM output.
view thread (12+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI
In-Reply-To: <CAKAnmm+v7Rby=QKs-TCDjr42tjazcndJOPw_6pZVFadU7v9rWw@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox