Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t44vq-00GINZ-SP for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 20:59:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t44uq-007wgR-PC for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 20:58:45 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t44uq-007wgI-Ad for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 20:58:44 +0000 Received: from mail-oa1-x34.google.com ([2001:4860:4864:20::34]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t44uk-002nQw-5D for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 20:58:44 +0000 Received: by mail-oa1-x34.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2891055c448so821833fac.0 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:58:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1729803516; x=1730408316; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xy9cuQlsH6kpRBmim+rLHAzUoNYRrP5s7Cqakr3DhC0=; b=aeH0EZyXkeMkWRizAUdv5polgyfSabJjNQY1fqjqJVraEcPSyXiK9OyfAbPtoMwXpp MGEwwE0JBDCSnYsTV9W0lEuzA/hwDNts8exNK+cS4jMcD0S8zqAa2yfyo5NEkyZAhxBF 3knsvzhu8uR3ghpcomVFRI9hLhW03JNMl6VPMJ7wSYoZzxVtZlfst9P6c0ctvaMzH6xn qsOahNmX4lx2E14lyrWzeH+Rh4qDjoo3mOl8lJqKd2/ZBE7BMVwO2wS0qIYI6JUt/GxN Xc4awzAxV536wVX6UdE0WqWFgnS/DV6D0aUntebGAKlcuOUdp1EVM3lfMkLnYeuHomWA tvMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729803516; x=1730408316; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=xy9cuQlsH6kpRBmim+rLHAzUoNYRrP5s7Cqakr3DhC0=; b=vY8TMZz2l1t7LaESk7WcB/WnPkCAHInd5w28asLN4UzsSu1rljX9hJchuXalLVeoin CdrQV5YPiLHXncXANt7UXe6E+2IPG9QoE4hRxBr9UNlulX/kqWO5OMeTa0AWe2ZhYBtv hTQALHQhmXShp8XMPs64q8iPBdns0CVtaQmakaaLT9H36LTXYwxXr3az5+VvBJYeF/ea JMQYtVP5BizXYFfnfetkzF3tqbIxOpn3ntTEjWAqY6rWjCf0GiSTWSXtevOtK+Vsu53E aKB2Wax25TXd/TDStMX2rneDY7ZYd4BCFMsbZu0KYYVIAcvMhu6QaBWLuJllg62SQk90 iHlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwF3Qw2fY9sbEkbO93BJ3AYd3xchhkXpA2HQrH/SjiDu3UNiREz LkQgOM0OhlT0Qfz93Iu583vZEOdMdgQZKvrBsEK9fT7Q0GeqLTX5/t3jInNhSIoYPQSqAnUQXAE FSr3bcPNSy1rzAnHxDCC4ghf8bV1M4w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGL9qfApszGh6p+eL0Y1tcQfpcFXE6UA845c+zhrQZrcz0+Y5OF5TyLh94fv/0+xugAPG8a/h/dcDp2IGMM790= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:459e:b0:288:33d1:a95e with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-28ccb97a91amr7514351fac.30.1729803515807; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:58:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a8a:1592:0:b0:56c:c9af:3ee6 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:58:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20241024214702.Horde.hYZQZgT8lc-DKEIqL9Ai-E3@webmail.gelassene-pferde.biz> References: <20241024214702.Horde.hYZQZgT8lc-DKEIqL9Ai-E3@webmail.gelassene-pferde.biz> From: "David G. Johnston" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:58:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plans for partitioning of inheriting tables To: "thiemo@gelassene-pferde.biz" Cc: PostgreSQL General Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000174d9606253f44c1" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000174d9606253f44c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, October 24, 2024, wrote: > > Up to version 17, partitioning of tables inheriting from other tables is > not possible. > >> psql:../code_files/data_storage/PostgreSQL/tables/TOPO_FILES.pg_sql:68: >> ERROR: no se puede crear una tabla particionada como hija de herencia >> > > Are there plans to support this in the future? I could not find any hint > in the documentation or in https://wiki.postgresql.org/wi > ki/Development_information. > My impression of things is that directly using =E2=80=9Cinherit=E2=80=9D fo= r table creation is considered deprecated at this point. No one has interest in expanding on the feature nor even recommends it be used in new development. That particular unique feature of PostgreSQL hasn=E2=80=99t caught on. David J. --000000000000174d9606253f44c1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, October 24, 2024, <thiemo@gelassene-pferde.biz> wrote:

Up to version 17, partitioning of tables inheriting from other tables is no= t possible.
psql:../code_files/data_storage/PostgreSQL/tables/TOPO_FILES.pg_s= ql:68: ERROR:=C2=A0 no se puede crear una tabla particionada como hija de h= erencia

Are there plans to support this in the future? I could not find any hint in= the documentation or in https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/= Development_information.

My impression of things is that directly u= sing =E2=80=9Cinherit=E2=80=9D for table creation is considered deprecated = at this point.=C2=A0 No one has interest in expanding on the feature nor ev= en recommends it be used in new development.=C2=A0 That particular unique f= eature of PostgreSQL hasn=E2=80=99t caught on.

Dav= id J.
=C2=A0
--000000000000174d9606253f44c1--