Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFRGx-002I1F-1x for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 04:32:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFRGv-007vfU-KS for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 04:32:14 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFRGv-007vfM-7q for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 04:32:14 +0000 Received: from mail-oo1-xc35.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c35]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFRGt-0006Mu-AY for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 04:32:12 +0000 Received: by mail-oo1-xc35.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5b97b5822d8so761241eaf.3 for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 21:32:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1717734730; x=1718339530; darn=postgresql.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Nj5MEzbwRq/Qk3j7fzxZvcaRX1WzWB7LiCwkVHtOG7Y=; b=bJpxae8MYHkyvHKop78TewJBJuexpan1SpXUvsNqosxns7j0Wo78d6+qKVP21r+qus 3XooLEzxDf4CUUr6R2J2C64yJRztDzupl8YJH2DCIlwt5mZzWowchsyPczhK2H6VBzgn Vv/JnAIkxCiMUyeisTW06xyem8mNkNnWtIPSAbWyRxVe57NvDkWv9ob6J1X/GGwcHum+ 2WVs2i1P2nTq1IQIvrH7NzSzzaJgmydwuFxXtj1X2CNxpu0QrHu2P837Pm5h2ggpvRZo HablwkAmIhJTDKpjOTQVc//rrMyj6auLoaQeOlZrfg8ns6p53+3MKQV0WDbxlQtyX9r0 K1TA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717734730; x=1718339530; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Nj5MEzbwRq/Qk3j7fzxZvcaRX1WzWB7LiCwkVHtOG7Y=; b=c2CKhlYxVPG8zq1S3gHJGk/k+1tAHOMWR3984omeFZEgv9NimjIh/gA7t5w1ywc4cx TNpIyCKm5aVCkcXi1V0puihVN5FnlaagDePDiU+Pf146MZfGx2UX3zfZh1gpoln9amcA LJWDXjfs+X7qUzRadC/oKBgzLRqS591pALG2HZy5CnFLyTuzvkM+PnSiXTNDAxntuU2c 7bgruY3skkgGDEoh+ZPmntzbT8xcsVfGkAouU1rUQbNr5UtMm1oN1+baFptPeJfCDjfR wGfVttBpN9xRnaik/Xup9WG0+fkUGLOySeJ9/uM8V3Hll2gq7CI1LeIWAZgXpXFq85oi gaTw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVi5uEBSxKWof7X3Zq6u2AsQfi3oG7/FsZ4Lo7EScjqK7evsTE2qu7pomdG0vHyOP3lJwv6tRcaDImSv0ll4nbkQar9lNkNjlvTRFrC X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz3gB8nOCDISZ3m4UEcYbS6ja4sA5KngAO9lO3CCV1MCCfwvWHr m5b1K/LulX1TzC5tj3vCySk4b86sPdtYAKdZ3aKe1RxZF1Dh3NPU1NHJ8krCebTsGKhzi+6kXZX cR3zuAa7kk9Xz/RZZN+iQO1osIXc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFbR+9jjH8vjB2auJpY6SrDMdohUPWfWcAEzBAwMcojKrye3VlDzAT6ssNSC3Jeduiq0vABYonYjIjj8JxZfnw= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:d590:0:b0:5ba:bb77:bf5a with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5babb77c648mr354307eaf.2.1717734730456; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 21:32:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:6802:387:b0:530:392d:d678 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 21:32:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "David G. Johnston" Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 21:32:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PG 14 pg_basebackup accepts --compress=server-zst option To: Kashif Zeeshan Cc: Ron Johnson , pgsql-general Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006d655a061a4548aa" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --0000000000006d655a061a4548aa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, June 6, 2024, Kashif Zeeshan wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 6:54=E2=80=AFAM Ron Johnson > wrote: > >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/app-pgbasebackup.html doesn't mention >> "--compress=3D[{client|server}-]method". That first appears in the v15 >> docs. >> >> And yet pg_basebackup doesn't complain about an invalid option. >> (Technically, this is a bug; I first noticed it a week after copying a >> script from a PG 15 server to five PG 14 servers, and running it quite a >> few times without fail.) >> > Seems a bit suspect, but as your script doesn=E2=80=99t mention tar the opt= ion itself is apparently ignored, I guess silently. Assuming this isn=E2=80=99= t an actual regression in behavior in a patch-released older version I don=E2=80= =99t see us adding an error message at this point. > If the support is removed then it should be mentioned in the official > documentation. > Support wasn=E2=80=99t removed. Re-read the email and check the version/ti= mes being mentioned again. David J. --0000000000006d655a061a4548aa Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, June 6, 2024, Kashif Zeeshan <kashi.zeeshan@gmail.com> wrote:


--0000000000006d655a061a4548aa--