public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
To: Ron Johnson <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Seeking Clarification on Function Definitions in PostgreSQL Extensions
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:57:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKFQuwbBAks7=R0GDmSY91YGLp3_kt7nQ3_K_4u38GLz34NbLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANzqJaCWEJb8VXK=063GnE9VF71EAijXf_MCjHj48ooAyUw9bw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACX+KaPBaSW+0PyMC7dmY6W9W8mPSbWpkJRhAOQOC9Qb0TjCQA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANzqJaA-Bmsq5npa1qCaQkDMb-4+9ZqZVUHqpVzURJ-RtSgS-w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwarhk+tg0iJVekT8FENSjhTBXhvVmbep6kWVrUzd1naaA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANzqJaCWEJb8VXK=063GnE9VF71EAijXf_MCjHj48ooAyUw9bw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, June 18, 2024, Ron Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> But I stand by returning OUT params and records at the same time.
>
You mean you dislike adding the optional returns clause when output
parameters exist? Because the out parameters and the “record” represent
the exact same thing.
David J.
view thread (8+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Seeking Clarification on Function Definitions in PostgreSQL Extensions
In-Reply-To: <CAKFQuwbBAks7=R0GDmSY91YGLp3_kt7nQ3_K_4u38GLz34NbLA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox