public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Thierry Henrio <[email protected]>
To: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: effect on planner of turning a subquery to a table, sql function returning table
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:27:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMPYKo27NBuOne_2H1D3xctxnWL6c-K3d_HDrKemDZ7e_fBruQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAApHDvrds5uuAhgQ9YChVOWLY10z88+ovrFN9=162Tw0kEXgrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMPYKo0CNfgU64VHtFe0pCP4_H9-bTXQGYKpdZLh8CcdWyGbyw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAApHDvrds5uuAhgQ9YChVOWLY10z88+ovrFN9=162Tw0kEXgrA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks David!
Here are the plans with (ANALYZE, BUFFERS), and track_io_timing ON:
(A)
GroupAggregate (cost=401037.82..503755.82 rows=1467400 width=124) (actual
time=416.851..426.534 rows=4670 loops=1)
Group Key: t.device_id, t.date, t.start_time, t.end_time,
(timerange(((t_1.value ->> 0))::time without time zone, ((t_1.value ->>
1))::time without time zone))
Buffers: shared hit=3067
-> Sort (cost=401037.82..404706.32 rows=1467400 width=96) (actual
time=416.812..417.855 rows=22908 loops=1)
Sort Key: t.device_id, t.date, t.start_time, t.end_time,
(timerange(((t_1.value ->> 0))::time without time zone, ((t_1.value ->>
1))::time without time zone)), t.rank
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 3229kB
Buffers: shared hit=3067
-> Nested Loop (cost=2.99..100268.62 rows=1467400 width=96)
(actual time=371.380..395.324 rows=22908 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=3067
-> Nested Loop (cost=2.98..55962.20 rows=14674 width=64)
(actual time=371.362..376.059 rows=11454 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=3067
-> Nested Loop (cost=2.54..39.31 rows=500 width=40)
(actual time=371.332..371.337 rows=1 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=3
-> Index Scan using campaigns_pkey on campaigns
c (cost=0.28..8.30 rows=1 width=355) (actual time=371.243..371.244 rows=1
loops=1)
Index Cond: (id = 11870)
Buffers: shared hit=3
-> Hash Join (cost=2.26..26.01 rows=500
width=40) (actual time=0.083..0.086 rows=1 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (EXTRACT(dow FROM d.date) =
((j.dow)::integer)::numeric)
-> Function Scan on generate_series d
(cost=0.01..10.01 rows=1000 width=8) (actual time=0.025..0.026 rows=1
loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=1.00..1.00 rows=100
width=64) (actual time=0.040..0.040 rows=7 loops=1)
Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory
Usage: 9kB
-> Function Scan on jsonb_each j
(cost=0.00..1.00 rows=100 width=64) (actual time=0.015..0.016 rows=7
loops=1)
-> Index Scan using device_timeslots_date_index on
device_timeslots t (cost=0.43..111.56 rows=29 width=32) (actual
time=0.023..3.477 rows=11454 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((date = d.date) AND (date >=
'2024-04-26'::date) AND (date <= '2024-04-26'::date))
Buffers: shared hit=3064
-> Memoize (cost=0.01..1.01 rows=100 width=32) (actual
time=0.000..0.000 rows=2 loops=11454)
Cache Key: j.times
Cache Mode: binary
Hits: 11453 Misses: 1 Evictions: 0 Overflows: 0
Memory Usage: 1kB
-> Function Scan on jsonb_array_elements t_1
(cost=0.00..1.00 rows=100 width=32) (actual time=0.004..0.005 rows=2
loops=1)
Planning:
Buffers: shared hit=4
Planning Time: 0.455 ms
JIT:
Functions: 36
Options: Inlining true, Optimization true, Expressions true, Deforming
true
Timing: Generation 1.949 ms, Inlining 28.891 ms, Optimization 207.481
ms, Emission 134.907 ms, Total 373.228 ms
Execution Time: 429.037 ms
And (B)
GroupAggregate (cost=70121.37..71282.14 rows=33165 width=124) (actual
time=37.895..48.577 rows=4670 loops=1)
Group Key: t.device_id, t.date, t.start_time, t.end_time, z.times
Buffers: shared hit=3064, local hit=1
-> Sort (cost=70121.37..70204.28 rows=33165 width=64) (actual
time=37.874..38.979 rows=22908 loops=1)
Sort Key: t.device_id, t.date, t.start_time, t.end_time, z.times,
t.rank
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 2737kB
Buffers: shared hit=3064, local hit=1
-> Merge Join (cost=67127.99..67631.11 rows=33165 width=64)
(actual time=9.587..15.797 rows=22908 loops=1)
Merge Cond: (z.date = t.date)
Buffers: shared hit=3064, local hit=1
-> Sort (cost=78.60..81.43 rows=1130 width=40) (actual
time=0.030..0.031 rows=2 loops=1)
Sort Key: z.date
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
Buffers: local hit=1
-> Seq Scan on z11870 z (cost=0.00..21.30 rows=1130
width=40) (actual time=0.016..0.018 rows=2 loops=1)
Buffers: local hit=1
-> Sort (cost=67049.39..67109.04 rows=23861 width=32)
(actual time=9.549..10.720 rows=22907 loops=1)
Sort Key: t.date
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 1100kB
Buffers: shared hit=3064
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on device_timeslots t
(cost=329.01..65314.41 rows=23861 width=32) (actual time=2.952..7.534
rows=11454 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: ((date >= '2024-04-26'::date) AND
(date <= '2024-04-26'::date))
Heap Blocks: exact=3052
Buffers: shared hit=3064
-> Bitmap Index Scan on
device_timeslots_date_index (cost=0.00..323.05 rows=23861 width=0) (actual
time=1.648..1.648 rows=11454 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((date >= '2024-04-26'::date)
AND (date <= '2024-04-26'::date))
Buffers: shared hit=12
Planning:
Buffers: shared hit=4
Planning Time: 0.587 ms
Execution Time: 49.163 ms
Both look correct on buffer hit? The first hits too much (11453) ?
view thread (4+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: effect on planner of turning a subquery to a table, sql function returning table
In-Reply-To: <CAMPYKo27NBuOne_2H1D3xctxnWL6c-K3d_HDrKemDZ7e_fBruQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox