Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vQYWK-00BC9w-1H for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2025 22:06:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vQYWJ-00A9BX-1c for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2025 22:06:51 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vQYWJ-00A9BP-0V for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2025 22:06:51 +0000 Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vQYWG-002oJ1-2w for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2025 22:06:50 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7aa2170adf9so5124050b3a.0 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2025 14:06:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1764713206; x=1765318006; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9to05HXHdk0cUCaBjLwZ7xn7fOXVZSvDSLkKBYS9C0M=; b=R/iADmzTbW8y3YjrI+niOlCZoYShWR/jajbjNgBJm0L2tF0ssKBdRznw84MCFyE+Ph avibeCKk3jxS8GBLpMkBZyb4NWRN9tkQOD68Y309Clw034+qFNXkaDoNuuiGzZAaztm2 eO/2rs8gtz6tyofxEoVj3jnkQSfgZXed5zuWV0ppSET1uBVVO6F7DoxSpKJcFA4y3kB2 QY9rV/6Jms8qUZSvmd9AfuBuUlKWs3nzQwZIwC43gFJP2v8V/DVOxZs+1Dl+Vy0aktNf gxieOufMDhasLDqw44sqyi8NuFoGuDJ1HU9yEv37yO3I5CyZ6S1ozfyoE6WsmDFGvccG bI4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1764713206; x=1765318006; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9to05HXHdk0cUCaBjLwZ7xn7fOXVZSvDSLkKBYS9C0M=; b=UNaELKky2N2tAc3NiVuqBBxdzqzKikWGsrd5gFWuZrkxgiCS3Drha1BLYhFFadaogV seXDWimN6/oX6aNbhIcelrqjdq8GicDhCXRIqiBamt4rfNiA9KnqjHXUM4+uCUM1kRZm IHQfGifhKA9DNw+L0+phIiNVzTxdau5nJ9aE3IL6t8/Zm2zBzeOWJFsyUhsODhadP7uF PojCFrsuqRtol8hqKiwJzav1KydW5vhf1cmkEZlf8m3fU+19snxw3aP94IQXbYRMygYM NIr67N0JQ/0Z2f65n565EtTuUriEKX4Bv7R+P4Od9wo5CAcMEdEV5Ubhskk17BT3lC75 wN8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy9FiXLauhyVZw0VTSEigtV2v2tcJfsGsh2oFfKkCKJwB/B2ONI DVMAmK7DpitnfTPJ2nMIjRHVUD65uGq3bEEv20HBVE2jqctrJ76dHRvYblLnPVodvruyxO3Gj2z UTNxvUMRtGTozr0/ZxB/4dLO8kuIrs3OTaFAsmlI= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctVJHW9E3enSqmpxtMjdsvlwONJyFqAvBhShDqyYPAOvdF3bfmplZ2htu1Ba/q 6XERmPzjwQFOgtVDvIi/KRsjqwBboDtInHS+SjEbmV+NALCMYaQX5OregL+oGfDi2slAZmNOezK UnmXAErDTedI0FzEwcQkkT+aCeOTe6fT5NTAp9XU2X8rzBA/Pf/G7NMYk329ceH7K4mFn5x7lFG 3mpXR/xUMX+CMSK8owED8o4V+/FGnDvxP1vHk3FmtSNu6pZbpQOK//4ses9H2fN9axKC2aJDEU4 NNEDa3RYJrkef6oZMyIi/DNDtf38ySNW07KbNxtcLcAHF85cJ3s3pXHdk0l8JP4POnj3Kd/erMJ wIJHoho+bniTJi2Cvw/FZ3BlezCh31dZuLqVh8TtbKKhZC+A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEcuPPi5pnYp3pF8BrmYeCBrjkh4SwXbk1af1OAs32uWKFiqVYk2NNIWXsBxKykXb/4fjhkOAE9Cs3EKujtdKw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:7022:1707:b0:11b:ca88:c50f with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-11df0c41881mr100293c88.40.1764713206116; Tue, 02 Dec 2025 14:06:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Colin 't Hart" Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 23:06:34 +0100 X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bnTmS3jzk6zT9UmtXb5EBAzbs6---TWcWrPEbqbSDhEGGF-d-zw7w_r4G4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wdavdaemon / Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on Linux and slow Postgres recovery? To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: PostgreSQL General Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c7f6970644ff4f09" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000c7f6970644ff4f09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thanks. I just get This setting is managed by your organization so I'm going to have to talk with the IT guys... we have a meeting scheduled tomorrow. /Colin On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 21:34, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Colin 't Hart (colinthart@gmail.com): > > > I wonder if anyone here has any experience with configuring exclusions so > > that the WAL files can be processed faster? > > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/linux-exclusions > mind this: > > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/linux-exclusions#supported-exclusion-scopes > and work from these examples (if you're allowed to): > > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/linux-exclusions#example-3-add-or-remove-a-folder-exclusion > > > Any advice on what to communicate with their IT department about using > this > > on their database servers? I've never encountered it on Linux before... > > "Be glad it only slows your database down. All too often, AV/Endpoint > Protection Products just don't like the access pattern and eat your > database for breakfast." There is this joke "it has been 0 days since > Anti-Virus ate a database". > > Regards, > Christoph > > -- > Spare Space > --000000000000c7f6970644ff4f09 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks. I just get

This sett= ing is managed by your organization

so I'm goi= ng to have to talk with the IT guys... we have a meeting scheduled tomorrow= .

/Colin

On Tue, 2 Dec = 2025 at 21:34, Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net> wrote:
## Colin 't Hart (colinthart@gmail.com):

> I wonder if anyone here has any experience with configuring exclusions= so
> that the WAL files can be processed faster?

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-u= s/defender-endpoint/linux-exclusions
mind this:
https= ://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/linux-exclusions#supported-e= xclusion-scopes
and work from these examples (if you're allowed to):
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/linux-exclu= sions#example-3-add-or-remove-a-folder-exclusion

> Any advice on what to communicate with their IT department about using= this
> on their database servers? I've never encountered it on Linux befo= re...

"Be glad it only slows your database down. All too often, AV/Endpoint<= br> Protection Products just don't like the access pattern and eat your
database for breakfast." There is this joke "it has been 0 days s= ince
Anti-Virus ate a database".

Regards,
Christoph

--
Spare Space
--000000000000c7f6970644ff4f09--