Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uH3ap-00CgTf-8N for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 May 2025 16:43:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uH3ao-00HJ3x-5r for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 May 2025 16:43:58 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uH3an-00HJ3F-Qr for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 May 2025 16:43:57 +0000 Received: from mail-oa1-x2e.google.com ([2001:4860:4864:20::2e]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uH3al-002iM2-0N for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Mon, 19 May 2025 16:43:57 +0000 Received: by mail-oa1-x2e.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2d071fcd89bso1024850fac.3 for ; Mon, 19 May 2025 09:43:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1747673033; x=1748277833; darn=postgresql.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WfT3T+YW6eRghCz3tNy/swcqs8WqcUp+ZIpXuhK4Ps8=; b=N6MBS3DAf0dMFmiAAMBSW4KlBI402QXPExYJIlBMy8blmTP2ohG4nr9vMfTo2h/OUh Tj6gLNMIGey/PlvD/kUDG0eaMduBS3Ya3/iLbQQn3YzgS5Tj5mSpF/LtT8aG/k4l9dn7 uxDGXCJjDj04JLn5eQ6U0CwMCx5vqwHQpn+dmpL3OuXXO/VniX/ADcNfYirQGZlL3VtK TUB95VuPHzJrKUjBBtIlc4upGJJR8aGyAYHB9FGAbL73OC6DkLuGgjMbRrrR9mEusIQY KjKb3pPVX8nmYjeVK/fOga8holUcACf0NjCw0nVMvYnUb/NugKX4seQrKp1NkZO2a+NK k3IA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747673033; x=1748277833; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WfT3T+YW6eRghCz3tNy/swcqs8WqcUp+ZIpXuhK4Ps8=; b=YpOFAM4OnTjpBQjAQKQipI4GUyLxN7ezieNa9mtmG4WFXq3qiDbFJGLlXpPwaQPRse IXBoFe1+pQO2Zp0kAhKtrUtHgPUvrHus2gUIlaDd2rygAO51e0n7v7oxNVoyX9u1A8u6 tTjZR0gA+klzHHVfaJJBkEtSjTQSdehMI1YFTwDlPxqoI9Cl/5ax7l9Yhec0cj7//OxV kcKcFKSR9KHEjMhBv4WyhBp5jl73XuXEt5VAppc8GFQ6C6rgzb3Jn2qNQnw2q1KsQpl8 B4mWGv9VevetfP615eGdUpKCxWuyfnDcHVhihQWLAbBV0mTtNv9wCR/Gp5K7bkP6tJBW Z64Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyHLf3fJIZDKTsnRXAV9t1YSakX2DvuKTZ4wDcvkHq/4GGFDoMK P55+g6yBXvLqEnMxBUNYwMy9RhgF5LQ9AX4PJcj0EhXFTyV8IPFY2g/Nt0a/ds5gsCdqH0Jzw7U wO/TjltZ7khA/qfzd8bs7cQo8o9juuIKEdA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvGmaV9Ug1oXujzTUVfMQDcy1EN0+vXHZwGIobjilvf4rIekxFmccWAyLMLQ1u BPucWrjohIM6riGukjf1SnBvKfqnmTK9DS+7LOHtJUsAa57WIikSM8dHzBXW36vrNdj+mA2RleA Qj4NFFkpUig9Ed4vs8QsCrU43I5ADL9pycyA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEJtF0EFbwEm+aOk0IpLiyMvAC0IFxyYUh0Knwz23cTkfyrxPu5jJ1NfyNzyf+dDinm9Jvw05GKxhz5v8EjycU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:6187:b0:2b7:d3f1:dc72 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2e3c1ed522emr8784858fac.29.1747673033165; Mon, 19 May 2025 09:43:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ron Johnson Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 12:43:42 -0400 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFuVT6-zV8D34zKxSDNdYxBKZ50D1zvRuV9086mpWr-e9ZigNrevfRnq8CA Message-ID: Subject: Re: get speed help To: pgsql-general Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000053525c06357fd629" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --00000000000053525c06357fd629 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Spinning rust? SSD? NVMe? SATA? SCSI? Fiber? Anyway... off the cuff, for 1 giga-rows, that's about a 50GB table. Small enough that you can easily test that yourself. On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:38=E2=80=AFPM Dias Thomas wrote: > Hello, > 1 field 20 chars plus primary key id field - small table > indexed on that char - 20 field , say 16 gb ram, amd normal power process= or > no parallel processing, to know it, the speed in single processor > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:55=E2=80=AFPM Ron Johnson > wrote: > >> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:12=E2=80=AFPM Dias Thomas >> wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> Could i get a help, postgres 1 billion records indexed table, search >>> speed in a normal machine, no parallel processing ... for a knowledge ?= ? >>> >> >> 1. How big are the records? >> 2. How big are the keys? >> 3. What is a normal machine? >> 4. Why no parallel processing? >> >> -- >> Death to , and butter sauce. >> Don't boil me, I'm still alive. >> lobster! >> > --=20 Death to , and butter sauce. Don't boil me, I'm still alive. lobster! --00000000000053525c06357fd629 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Spinning rust?=C2=A0 SSD?=C2=A0 NVMe? SATA? SCSI?=C2= =A0 Fiber?

Anyway... off the cuff, for 1 giga-rows= , that's about a 50GB table.=C2=A0 Small enough that you can easily tes= t that yourself.

=
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:38=E2=80= =AFPM Dias Thomas <dsthomas500@= gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
1 field 20 chars plus primary key id= field - small table
indexed on that char - 20 field , say 16 gb ram, a= md normal power processor
no parallel processing, to know it, the= speed in single processor

=
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:55=E2=80=AF= PM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, May 1= 9, 2025 at 12:12=E2=80=AFPM Dias Thomas <dsthomas500@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all,
=C2=A0Could i get a help, postgres 1 billion re= cords indexed table, search speed in a normal machine, no parallel processi= ng ... for a knowledge ??

1. How = big are the records?
2. How big are the keys?
3. What i= s a normal machine?
4. Why no parallel processing?

=
--
Death to <Redacted&g= t;, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<= div><Redacted> lobster!


--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobs= ter!
--00000000000053525c06357fd629--