Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1slXNL-008Sgg-QO for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:31:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1slXNK-00EcR9-Vt for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:31:31 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1slXNK-00EcPi-Hz for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:31:30 +0000 Received: from mail-oo1-xc2f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2f]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1slXNI-000Uoi-0z for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:31:29 +0000 Received: by mail-oo1-xc2f.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5df9dec9c0eso3706992eaf.2 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 10:31:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725384686; x=1725989486; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=plZIOM6jbThlLcORsO9TPCcIErYTWQv6K7aYhx32zMc=; b=eym5Ryv1UfgWJfpH9w1E+eX533QFG8aJ1f9fCpBeBJiw57gDY1X0VafvBkw2K9d0mA jCBajU5xGEh0llOq2iLsgzYIzy6tdY4JWC4glknS7yx0YiqLQo+5dU8w2WfL6xOYtIOL +zlnftzhqaFOAfQ/frUMzoud/Eaqr/LEcUOMsu5jbvyCIASckt1nyy431zt9F1qR2YcG ezAWA4487pKKgQzSXXEFd/bzdltD41eI+5ihec9Os6jb/hdR+LnBpPaKeE38ii+U5jwd aguy2OimaB2V30zBPdrZwk39NkIuAHavfZxfOt3fn0Z2+uGgfIl+8ToNpm7TwWUhJmBv cfhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725384686; x=1725989486; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=plZIOM6jbThlLcORsO9TPCcIErYTWQv6K7aYhx32zMc=; b=mM7GIExRWceRz9de3Wkm89atzRem6B+RlloIjgcpl3Dni89RsjmdcjQP9oFXngz+h0 0trd9p9j5+4SAXcHwcdbg+amROELOHikRYVuWwKEHvEy84AN1b3G+cJpA9zQfgUXvjGt nmOEtbfkC7GJFfBoitkfRPLlJu663vbCZD1dR81v6LQPTzzXbOtMRpPQNwDptITA36K8 l6rXWXXVLWuEwwsMRLqMFdeIN1h9hdTLum+ni4JwtIZfKDVpl/f+oB4zEsfFieGkO+hm 2g26Wt/eiNe4ODcB3chSE+kv1UpbkeTZ+Iqo3PoDOhxDkordznHaOZDACsZqOO9e64Z3 9h2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxXSlAoNmUGKwB0+4J0unhdmCwMTeRvFOO0KcVv99VdCsucsPqw FWcsQjTTgLqVvFHSGF4lQuCBYCjREyu2+OycoD6nrPR1bOtS1mDJ+UfjDo4patMI/PT6NBExHLT +DZ58LRvTaIw/pTD60kgFesRsrZhuoA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG25VXJ+f4uIQoRkH/dy+k+AZZNl08PNS4Lstb8Vde/cWXhNyx+60u4ScFp+Zbfea4U87icE8CqQX36s3bk0XE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:568f:b0:270:184b:ccd9 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-27800506b63mr6684088fac.39.1725384685683; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 10:31:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ron Johnson Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 13:31:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Table and data comparison To: "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004a8e4106213a6d70" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --0000000000004a8e4106213a6d70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable postgres_fdw will be required if the tables are in separate databases. On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 12:36=E2=80=AFPM David Mullineux = wrote: > Yes, PostgreSQL. > Why not just do this via SQL join ? > > On Tue, 3 Sept 2024, 17:34 arun chirappurath, > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Do we have any open-source utility to compare two table data not >> structure and then provide some sort of reports? >> >> Row by row comparison >> >> Thanks, >> Arun >> > --=20 Death to America, and butter sauce. Iraq lobster! --0000000000004a8e4106213a6d70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
postgres_fdw will be required if the tables are in se= parate databases.

On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 = at 12:36=E2=80=AFPM David Mullineux <dmullx@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes, PostgreSQL.=
Why not just do this via SQL join ?


On Tue= , 3 Sept 2024, 17:34 arun chirappurath, <arunsnmimt@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Do we have any open-source utili= ty to compare two table data not structure and then provide some sort of re= ports?

Row by row compar= ison

Thanks,
Arun=C2=A0


--
Death to America, and butter sauce.
Iraq lobster!
<= /div>
--0000000000004a8e4106213a6d70--