Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1yf5-00GTF7-Ck for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 May 2024 01:21:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1yf2-009nYI-FG for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 May 2024 01:21:29 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1yf2-009nYA-4P for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 May 2024 01:21:29 +0000 Received: from mail-oo1-xc2f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2f]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1yf0-000rCA-KH for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Wed, 01 May 2024 01:21:27 +0000 Received: by mail-oo1-xc2f.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5af23552172so3804064eaf.1 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:21:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714526486; x=1715131286; darn=postgresql.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xrbSIebi5+C5OZ69bokv/PZJbaHPDuVUZHXWtK5iyvg=; b=MuChS3ucEcC+hiGvl2Wc5KFWojw5lyOGrKQf2ZSHNDzFDaPrimoK/t5EZBuFUQZJnm WByZEZV6HnDxdkziN8c26MnOpJr/MZMZSmYVG5BXHzcGizK73b4swkjtDtFbmCAStgBj Ksu9KDug5KxdH3C3fWbMMerRLFFpOOBivjuqSU8JPs1ygY8CN5YYv0XzcqfBfs9rDfsp 4fntKJn1TzgaIE1P1NPkM07bU6z6xbWWm7sLKToZI3ynJXGh/lPLedMa53r/XskT1Mzf GuMOF+kGhahRhLW0KN9NvTDBuA8ekheaNnTPK42EKVeniT2ohuSuqi8l/qcRF39iqvgC GdWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714526486; x=1715131286; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xrbSIebi5+C5OZ69bokv/PZJbaHPDuVUZHXWtK5iyvg=; b=KnNMJjJEiwhN0tsOTv9VznOPv6okxyQ9PxJFhIqNNQ1LuTkNI0IIkxY+wYEB6N6zap smwd0k4gEsCslQ/F1GE9sQ18aooHyITV4exM+8VSdQoJGCvAHcyiKcCBXk34sv2Vapi8 ISi8HkjuRiX8llFfGmFyqzMkH2Z/c1hWALtjJZhU7uk3g/SritlD8kKF6StiekhZj63/ 9lR3wQ0+nOFL9ZeUjV+GoCqSiYkcElWTDFY/Iie0wY1HhGMpzk45vSu8oKnVkbSSuk5N aqQimlPWKk3rqQ1DwiQhoRR5lk0VR0MWn1e7QZ4Eq+Uu0vKCtANNXBQA3sx672XbqJDZ SaJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwuvEIuew5e6jnIEHgpM7G5Oj79bnPnlcpRmqkwzigiWqRFRWhG b7kqAuMQdNPY8jWjKQZ17BnwNc6s9dy7Wpb5BO+p+GemuWXCmtuorqXiIE/B90gMjVyyizJTerj H2ZsbSILj5HsRauVgaPRdKfH937I8Jg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEE0MvAOsocHIcS00qzznHrBNUf3X7cbXRf0MNuSYf3bbpqIpetti2hrIB7mxBRI3yaA+HnuoOB2O6J8ki0Yco= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:9127:b0:22e:7390:da7 with SMTP id o39-20020a056870912700b0022e73900da7mr1383845oae.21.1714526485694; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:21:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ron Johnson Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:21:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Posgresql 14 and CarbonBlack on RHEL8? To: pgsql-general Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000234e8706175a4efe" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000234e8706175a4efe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" (CarbonBlack is cross-platform AV software sold by VMware.) Currently we're running PG 9.6.24 on RHEL 6.10 with CB (version unknown to me) in production, and testing PG 14.11 on RHEL 8.9 with CB 2.15.2 (hopefully going into production next month). Both old and new VMs are 32 CPU with 128GB RAM. Nothing but PG, CB and itsm software runs on these systems. When running stress tests on the systems (in prod, during the maintenance window), 171K events/second are generated on the RHEL8 servers, and CB needs (according to top(1)) 325% of CPU to handle that, and still dropping 92% of them. The RHEL6 system doesn't bat an eye at running the exact same test (36 cron jobs running psql executing SELECT statements). The small RHEL8/PG14 non-prod systems show similar load when lots of SELECT statements run. Has anyone else seen this? If so, how did you resolve it? --000000000000234e8706175a4efe Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
(CarbonBlack is cross-platform AV software sold by VM= ware.)

Currently we're running PG 9.6.24 on RHEL 6.= 10 with CB (version unknown to me) in production, and testing PG 14.11 on R= HEL 8.9 with CB 2.15.2 (hopefully going into production next month).
Both old and new VMs are 32 CPU with 128GB RAM.
Noth= ing but PG, CB and itsm software runs on these systems.

When running stress tests on the systems (in prod, during the mainten= ance window), 171K events/second are generated on the RHEL8 servers, and CB= needs (according to top(1)) 325% of CPU to handle that, and still dropping= 92% of them.
The RHEL6 system doesn't bat an eye at running = the exact same test (36 cron jobs running psql executing=C2=A0SELECT statem= ents).

The small RHEL8/PG14 non-prod systems show = similar load when lots of SELECT statements=C2=A0run.

<= div>Has anyone else seen this?=C2=A0 If so, how did you resolve it?

--000000000000234e8706175a4efe--