Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tEPnw-007CVn-NR for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 09:18:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tEPnu-0071sK-SL for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 09:18:18 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tEPnu-0071sB-Hn for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 09:18:18 +0000 Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tEPns-003FZn-9Z for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 09:18:17 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3e7e2e6ce0aso898139b6e.0 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 01:18:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1732267094; x=1732871894; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xnhC1lnrwe6HHO9C14Q0Jqhd95hpxtfcF+9prZk1VR0=; b=S1IjO6Pv2tTNXp7V84gj61z3oRVx4lkRsHOQJzXx+7bCvMGS0Y0gWMvlTFWtZ5qCGQ 7gkLmBnGeGp32yFeRgi5J8ZynOKmppI1YcKhFEJDev8tJphrFfNgxEfEBJNerwnk4qck Q54mY1P3Ud9ENN3uxDdeSsfG5S3pnh9j+TLmyRnHRyCIsglLG8DRwyVscXp/V8GhwKZ1 VUxDxGL5C4TdcDjkOrD1zHF8O3cjZvcYFpS3SYWgEEJzQE+JDyfVeeeVut82w6XPrFql C95QQ2It4zpjYK0ur3JiuSyb7ypTzmxgbwQmsY7NNH6Kux9imGA8rA4fAtgRJ6XvwRZk Id4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1732267094; x=1732871894; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xnhC1lnrwe6HHO9C14Q0Jqhd95hpxtfcF+9prZk1VR0=; b=XYgAQMkxeoDr/UR3G1TbcxWCyMqJV2jbMIJXJG2uXPYkQzb/x5pYBlaXiJngfBSzec 3P2WSqY2rt10aj/Pn1Z8NuRezlHFOB8m1DAZDohBDV57zIiYGmVYzhoc4lUKEOKNJLQ1 O3br99NECykEelNVYtukLHwlTxhO/GaTHCMD9sTJgq1Go4lhFgAZDDfCX4vWVKDIDXpO EsGyJtl9I6bj9s61Ds1m15sUETYPnFQYpw52bYiHZvbUC25gArCEO5UnPEsE7N4IBcDW quDuhvyj4NGhLEwX0J5QXxt/OW7mVcdxVsgWJoLHXI56PVg5NrgwgsiIOxWXYlVuLcoR SneA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwVFO9yjJXzm2GQAgmE3QJzomoR+L4DONxwiodVnf3Bw9NrI5dX CdmniXehHPemBej+8nP+/J9BZa+lV5HeRCxzXZHtuGpEPqRvKrJwMekavJgw9jJ8cB8g1YlLr8I FGoXLJjw+VW03eywihxqoR1LAthIpLQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs/D1oXaRGPLbVpBKXZN6IMEOK4B74ZAVGgBfsmdV1m1RkLtkHjZgp2xGqRhod r8Z34QVEoh7qzADTE2f9vBmcoQAP5+Qt/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFw3CPaM8jMxAL9nLBuMvAIE/ZBGFcvCkYAKm9zkaqmD/7CmkIRoZkwM1uxL7pBLSdqSVRk6M1A0YApJgBm9p8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:17aa:b0:3e7:ad4c:e856 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3e915a5f6d2mr2421940b6e.35.1732267093900; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 01:18:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7b5846ac-c16e-48d3-b548-99a772a528c5@aklaver.com> <6c898e6499036ce70ac113b52df5c3ff06286a6a.camel@cybertec.at> <6bcf33ea-f856-41d0-912e-9468dbf3af13@cloud.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: <6bcf33ea-f856-41d0-912e-9468dbf3af13@cloud.gatewaynet.com> From: Ron Johnson Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 04:18:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CVE-2024-10979 Vulnerability Impact on PostgreSQL 11.10 To: "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c9c86606277cdc6a" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000c9c86606277cdc6a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 4:01=E2=80=AFAM Achilleas Mantzios - cloud < a.mantzios@cloud.gatewaynet.com> wrote: > > On 11/22/24 10:00, Matthias Apitz wrote: > [snip] > > Why not decouple client libs from the server ? i.e. psql works great > with many versions greater than its own. And certainly with same major > versions. You could retain the same client libs and just upgrade the > PgSQL server to the highest minor version of the major version that you > support. > Small VARs that sell turnkey solutions would rather bundle everything together. One application version, one database version, one OS version, one set of hardware, all bundled up and sold to a tech-illiterate customer that doesn't employ a DBA or SysAdmin. That way, when something stops working, you aren't guessing if it's this patch, that patch, etc etc. Not saying that Matthias works for such a VAR, but such companies definitely exist. --=20 Death to , and butter sauce. Don't boil me, I'm still alive. lobster! --000000000000c9c86606277cdc6a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 4:01=E2=80=AFAM A= chilleas Mantzios - cloud <a.mantzios@cloud.gatewaynet.com> wrote:

On 11/22/24 10:00, Matthias Apitz wrote:
[snip]=C2=A0<= /div>

Why not decouple client libs from the server ? i.e. psql works great
with many versions greater than its own. And certainly with same major
versions. You could retain the same client libs and just upgrade the
PgSQL server to the highest minor version of the major version that you support.

Small VARs that sell t= urnkey solutions would rather bundle everything together.=C2=A0 One applica= tion version, one database version, one OS version, one set of hardware, al= l bundled up and sold to a tech-illiterate customer that doesn't employ= a DBA or SysAdmin.=C2=A0 That way, when something stops=C2=A0working, you = aren't guessing if it's this patch, that patch, etc etc.
=
Not saying that Matthias works for such a VAR, but such comp= anies definitely exist.

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me= , I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
--000000000000c9c86606277cdc6a--