public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Max Ulidtko <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Getting error 42P02, despite query parameter being sent
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:55:35 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Greetings, group!
I'm trying to understand a low-level issue. Am evaluating a new client
library for Postgres; it's not particularly popular / mainstream, and
as I've understood so far, sports an independent implementation of PG
binary protocol.
The issue I'm hitting with it is exemplified by server logs like this:
2024-11-16 10:28:19.927 UTC [46] LOG: statement: SET client_encoding =
'UTF8';SET client_min_messages TO WARNING;
2024-11-16 10:28:19.928 UTC [46] LOG: execute <unnamed>: CREATE VIEW
public.foobar (alg, hash) AS VALUES ('md5', $1);
2024-11-16 10:28:19.928 UTC [46] DETAIL: parameters: $1 =
'test-param-value'
2024-11-16 10:28:19.928 UTC [46] ERROR: there is no parameter $1 at
character 57
Of course, I /am/ passing a value for parameter $1; and I can trace
that the client lib sends it out on the wire as expected. (Attaching
packet captures.)
Heck, even the PG server itself says, DETAIL: parameters: $1 =
'test-param-value' — so it sees the parameter! But then, immediately
unsees it.
Am I being hit by a PG bug? Is this a known issue?
I'd retested with master version of that client library, and against 6
latest major versions of PostgreSQL server (12 throughout to 17). No
difference across versions spotted; the result is consistently error
42P02.
Is the client library doing something wrong? How can the server claim
there's no parameter $1 immediately after logging its value it has
received?
I did minify a 100-line SSCCE that reproduces the issue and can be
shared.
Any advice, or pointers on what to check next besides delving into PG
source, I'd greatly appreciate. Thanks in advance.
Max
Attachments:
[application/vnd.tcpdump.pcap] query42P02-with-prepstatement-on.pcap (2.5K, 3-query42P02-with-prepstatement-on.pcap)
download
[application/vnd.tcpdump.pcap] query42P02-with-prepstatement-off.pcap (2.3K, 4-query42P02-with-prepstatement-off.pcap)
download
view thread (4+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Getting error 42P02, despite query parameter being sent
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox