public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zechman, Derek S <[email protected]>
To: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
To: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 01:23:59 +0000
Message-ID: <PH0PR04MB82943D67CD179002714AA503C044A@PH0PR04MB8294.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CO1PR04MB8281387B9AD9DE30976966BBC045A@CO1PR04MB8281.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

> > We recently performed an upgrade from pg14 (14.18) to pg16 (16.9) and

> > performed the analyze-in-stages post upgrade.  It has been noticed that

> > some plans changed to use hash joins instead of nested loops.  Further

> > investigation found it was because the parent table of partitioned

> > tables did not have stats.  After running an ANALYZE on the parent

> > tables we got similar plan an execution times as before.

> >

> > I have two questions

> >

> > 1 - Why does analyze-in-stages not analyze the parent tables?

> >

> > 2 – What happens if we do not run analyze-in-stages post upgrade and

> > just run an analyze?

>

> It is spelled out in the docs:

>

> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/pgupgrade.html__;!!Lf_9VycLqA!jU...;

>

> Emphasis added

>

> "Using vacuumdb --all --analyze-only can efficiently generate such

> statistics, and the use of --jobs can speed it up. Option

> --analyze-in-stages can be used to generate **minimal statistics**

> quickly. If vacuum_cost_delay is set to a non-zero value, this can be

> overridden to speed up statistics generation using PGOPTIONS, e.g.,

> PGOPTIONS='-c vacuum_cost_delay=0' vacuumdb ...."

>

> and from here:

>

> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/app-vacuumdb.html__;!!Lf_9VycLqA...;

>

> "--analyze-in-stages

>

>      Only calculate statistics for use by the optimizer (no vacuum),

> like --analyze-only. Run three stages of analyze; the first stage uses

> the lowest possible statistics target (see default_statistics_target) to

> produce usable statistics faster, and subsequent stages build the full

> statistics.

>

>      This option is only useful to analyze a database that currently has

> no statistics or has wholly incorrect ones, such as if it is newly

> populated from a restored dump or by pg_upgrade. Be aware that running

> with this option in a database with existing statistics may cause the

> query optimizer choices to become transiently worse due to the low

> statistics targets of the early stages.



Well, that wouldn't explain why it doesn't work on partitioned tables.

I am under the impression that it should.



Derek, can cou share the pg_stats entries for the partitioned table?



Yours,

Laurenz Albe





There are no entries in pg_stats for the parent table until after I manually run an analyze on it – Example below



=> select relname, reltuples, relkind from pg_class where relname ~ '^chapter_[0-9]+$' or relname='chapter' order by 1;

   relname   | reltuples | relkind

-------------+-----------+---------

 chapter     |        -1 | p

 chapter_1   |         4 | r

 chapter_10  |         4 | r

 chapter_100 |        30 | r

 chapter_101 |        15 | r

 chapter_102 |        15 | r

…

=> select count(*) from pg_stats where tablename='chapter';

 count

-------

     0

(1 row)



=> analyze chapter;

ANALYZE

=> select relname, reltuples, relkind from pg_class where relkind ='p' and relname='chapter';

 relname | reltuples | relkind

---------+-----------+---------

 chapter |      7589 | p

(1 row)



=> select count(*) from pg_stats where tablename='chapter';

 count

-------

    49

(1 row)



toy_epc_stg_1_db=>


view thread (3+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: RE: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions
  In-Reply-To: <PH0PR04MB82943D67CD179002714AA503C044A@PH0PR04MB8294.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox