public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedRe: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI
3+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI
@ 2024-08-20 12:44 Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2024-08-20 16:19 ` Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI Justin Clift <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg Sabino Mullane @ 2024-08-20 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>; +Cc: David Rowley <[email protected]>; pgsql-general <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 3:22 AM Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Why not say that authors who repeatedly post grossly counterfactual or
> misleading content can be banned?
>
I like this, and feel we are getting closer. How about:
"Posts should be technically and factually correct. Use of AI should be
used for minor editing, not primary generation"
(wordsmithing needed)
Cheers,
Greg
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI
2024-08-20 12:44 Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
@ 2024-08-20 16:19 ` Justin Clift <[email protected]>
2024-08-20 16:58 ` Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Justin Clift @ 2024-08-20 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; +Cc: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>; David Rowley <[email protected]>; pgsql-general <[email protected]>
On 2024-08-20 22:44, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 3:22 AM Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Why not say that authors who repeatedly post grossly counterfactual or
>> misleading content can be banned?
>
> I like this, and feel we are getting closer. How about:
>
> "Posts should be technically and factually correct. Use of AI should be
> used for minor editing, not primary generation"
Sounds pretty sensible. :)
+ Justin
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI
2024-08-20 12:44 Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2024-08-20 16:19 ` Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI Justin Clift <[email protected]>
@ 2024-08-20 16:58 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Momjian @ 2024-08-20 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin Clift <[email protected]>; +Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>; David Rowley <[email protected]>; pgsql-general <[email protected]>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 02:19:22AM +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 2024-08-20 22:44, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 3:22 AM Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Why not say that authors who repeatedly post grossly counterfactual or
> > > misleading content can be banned?
> >
> > I like this, and feel we are getting closer. How about:
> >
> > "Posts should be technically and factually correct. Use of AI should be
> > used for minor editing, not primary generation"
>
> Sounds pretty sensible. :)
Agreed. Honestly, some of the AI is so bad that if you see something you
suspect is AI generated, you can just ask the author what they meant by
that paragraph, and they will not be able to answer.
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-20 16:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-20 12:44 Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2024-08-20 16:19 ` Justin Clift <[email protected]>
2024-08-20 16:58 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox