public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fwd: Postgres attach partition: AccessExclusive lock set on different tables depending on how attaching is performed
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 11:07:22 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDhG9YqwVzXFFZ+19XggHYsYaRVROGxoTn=E6GS_J=t5tpAdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPDhG9aVAt6ed7Lji=G3XhcGRFz0FxHkGiuxmRu=hZgWW9D0OA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAPDhG9aZMS_nocLJ86bFHHqd1t=QOdztcR0Uy8BC5xpFrdes3A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPDhG9bvTyiCG_Z0pmuD_57z7xCbSn2ExkCvAbcgtkmMws9u8A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAPDhG9YM2B-P4ozEznSKXas+LGe6yDW4-QE=eKcxtvnis9eOvQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPDhG9YqwVzXFFZ+19XggHYsYaRVROGxoTn=E6GS_J=t5tpAdQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/10/24 05:18, user wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry for nagging, but I would really like to find some answers.
> So, to reiterate. Experiment done as follows:
> """""""""""""""""""""'
> CREATE TABLE refs (
> id integer primary key,
> did integer
> );
> CREATE TABLE films (
> id integer,
> code char(5) ,
> title varchar(40) NOT NULL,
> did integer NOT NULL references refs(id)
> )
> partition by list (code);
>
> insert into refs values (5, 5)
> create table films_partition (LIKE films INCLUDING ALL)
> insert into films_partition values (1, 'dr', 'musician',5)
> alter table films_partition add constraint check_code check (code = 'dr');
> alter table films_partition ADD CONSTRAINT fk_did FOREIGN KEY (did)
> REFERENCES refs (id);
> """""""""""""""""""""""""
> Then, when we open a transaction and try to attach:
> """""""""""""""""""""""""
> BEGIN;
> ALTER TABLE films ATTACH PARTITION films_partition for values in ('dr')
> keep the transaction running..
> """"""""""""""""""""""""
> Once we check a locks, we will see that there is AccessExclusiveLock on
> table refs.
> """"""
> select relname, mode
> from pg_locks l
> join pg_class c on (relation = c.oid)
> join pg_namespace nsp on (c.relnamespace = nsp.oid);
> """""
> My questions are:
> 1. Why is postgres adding again a constraint? Can't it detect that
> foreign key already exists? I want to avoid locking partitioned table
> for too long.
I see, I missed it my previous post:
alter table films_partition ADD CONSTRAINT fk_did FOREIGN KEY (did)
REFERENCES refs (id);
\d films_partition
Foreign-key constraints:
"fk_did" FOREIGN KEY (did) REFERENCES refs(id)
ALTER TABLE films ATTACH PARTITION films_partition for values in ('dr')
\d films_partition
Foreign-key constraints:
TABLE "films" CONSTRAINT "films_did_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (did)
REFERENCES refs(id)
The FK constraint changes from being
films_partition <--> refs
to
films <--> refs
> 2. Even when attach is adding a foreign key again, why is there
> AccessExclusiveLock on refs table? foreign key constraint addition does
> not require it.
> https://pglocks.org/?pgcommand=ALTER%20TABLE%20ADD%20FOREIGN%20KEY%20(CHILD) <https://pglocks.org/?pgcommand=ALTER%20TABLE%20ADD%20FOREIGN%20KEY%20(CHILD);
> 3. If I repeat the steps listed above, but do not add foreign key
> manually, then attach partition does not hold AccessExclusive lock on
> table refs. It still needs to add a foreign key, as "films" table has
> that constraint. Why is the AccessExclusive lock missing from "refs"
> table now?
Best guess because the FK is changing referencing table and in:
~//src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
"CloneFkReferencing
For each FK constraint of the parent relation in the given list, find an
equivalent constraint in its partition relation that can be reparented;
if one cannot be found, create a new constraint in the partition as its
child."
[...]
addFkRecurseReferencing(wqueue,
fkconstraint,
partRel,
pkrel,
indexOid,
constrOid,
numfks,
confkey,
mapped_conkey,
conpfeqop,
conppeqop,
conffeqop,
numfkdelsetcols,
confdelsetcols,
false, /* no old check exists */
AccessExclusiveLock,
insertTriggerOid,
updateTriggerOid);
>
> Regards!
--
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]
view thread (7+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fwd: Postgres attach partition: AccessExclusive lock set on different tables depending on how attaching is performed
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox