public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Ayush Vatsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:52:09 -0500
Message-ID: <aNQhuRQfD3PlpeuT@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CACX+KaO4R9QDxbPSxSB0jNXFsqA6Jf=UPS+tyUvT_YvuP_grVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<Z8yxsm9ZWVkHlPbV@nathan>
	<CACX+KaP+6U9jf=GT4wpR7TvRvSMtTAhz=vP2Zr+ZdUFVZzqNsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<Z8y9RTT-vU6oVI_Y@nathan>
	<[email protected]>
	<Z8zwVmGzXyDdkAXj@nathan>
	<[email protected]>
	<Z88CB-vDehJ9rW8u@nathan>
	<aNQVIVKarUipPcnW@nathan>
	<[email protected]>

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:13:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> writes:
>> * RangeVarCallbackForReindexIndex() was checking privileges on the table
>> before locking it, so I reversed it in 0002.
> 
> Don't we do that intentionally, to make sure someone can't cause DOS
> on a table they have no privileges on?

Ah, right.  I switched it back in v4.

-- 
nathan

From 9cf6e507808cbd4a5c8b93422881ec078ce66f60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:24:28 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] fix priv checks in stats code

---
 src/backend/statistics/stat_utils.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/backend/statistics/stat_utils.c b/src/backend/statistics/stat_utils.c
index ef7e5168bed..8b8203a58e3 100644
--- a/src/backend/statistics/stat_utils.c
+++ b/src/backend/statistics/stat_utils.c
@@ -189,6 +189,17 @@ stats_lock_check_privileges(Oid reloid)
 
 		Assert(index->rd_index && index->rd_index->indrelid == table_oid);
 
+		/*
+		 * Since we did the IndexGetRelation() call above without any lock,
+		 * it's barely possible that a race against an index drop/recreation
+		 * could have netted us the wrong table.
+		 */
+		if (table_oid != IndexGetRelation(index_oid, true))
+			ereport(ERROR,
+					(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_TABLE),
+					 errmsg("could not find parent table of index \"%s\"",
+							RelationGetRelationName(index))));
+
 		/* retain lock on index */
 		relation_close(index, NoLock);
 	}
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


From 3f6d161c46456b95dfae949ecbe44bd028b6a37d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:24:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] fix priv checks in index code

---
 src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | 41 ++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
index ca2bde62e82..2a6e58eb0de 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
@@ -2976,6 +2976,7 @@ RangeVarCallbackForReindexIndex(const RangeVar *relation,
 	struct ReindexIndexCallbackState *state = arg;
 	LOCKMODE	table_lockmode;
 	Oid			table_oid;
+	AclResult	aclresult;
 
 	/*
 	 * Lock level here should match table lock in reindex_index() for
@@ -2985,12 +2986,8 @@ RangeVarCallbackForReindexIndex(const RangeVar *relation,
 	table_lockmode = (state->params.options & REINDEXOPT_CONCURRENTLY) != 0 ?
 		ShareUpdateExclusiveLock : ShareLock;
 
-	/*
-	 * If we previously locked some other index's heap, and the name we're
-	 * looking up no longer refers to that relation, release the now-useless
-	 * lock.
-	 */
-	if (relId != oldRelId && OidIsValid(oldRelId))
+	/* Unlock any previously locked heap. */
+	if (OidIsValid(state->locked_table_oid))
 	{
 		UnlockRelationOid(state->locked_table_oid, table_lockmode);
 		state->locked_table_oid = InvalidOid;
@@ -3014,30 +3011,22 @@ RangeVarCallbackForReindexIndex(const RangeVar *relation,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
 				 errmsg("\"%s\" is not an index", relation->relname)));
 
-	/* Check permissions */
+	/*
+	 * If the OID isn't valid, it means the index was concurrently dropped,
+	 * which is not a problem for us; just return normally.
+	 */
 	table_oid = IndexGetRelation(relId, true);
-	if (OidIsValid(table_oid))
-	{
-		AclResult	aclresult;
+	if (!OidIsValid(table_oid))
+		return;
 
-		aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(table_oid, GetUserId(), ACL_MAINTAIN);
-		if (aclresult != ACLCHECK_OK)
-			aclcheck_error(aclresult, OBJECT_INDEX, relation->relname);
-	}
+	/* Check permissions */
+	aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(table_oid, GetUserId(), ACL_MAINTAIN);
+	if (aclresult != ACLCHECK_OK)
+		aclcheck_error(aclresult, OBJECT_INDEX, relation->relname);
 
 	/* Lock heap before index to avoid deadlock. */
-	if (relId != oldRelId)
-	{
-		/*
-		 * If the OID isn't valid, it means the index was concurrently
-		 * dropped, which is not a problem for us; just return normally.
-		 */
-		if (OidIsValid(table_oid))
-		{
-			LockRelationOid(table_oid, table_lockmode);
-			state->locked_table_oid = table_oid;
-		}
-	}
+	LockRelationOid(table_oid, table_lockmode);
+	state->locked_table_oid = table_oid;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


From 2c1da2d3db13603da4b2cded4a2dcf0d86614ca0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:47:02 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] fix priv checks in pg_prewarm

---
 contrib/pg_prewarm/pg_prewarm.c   | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 contrib/pg_prewarm/t/001_basic.pl | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/pg_prewarm/pg_prewarm.c b/contrib/pg_prewarm/pg_prewarm.c
index b968933ea8b..810a291204b 100644
--- a/contrib/pg_prewarm/pg_prewarm.c
+++ b/contrib/pg_prewarm/pg_prewarm.c
@@ -16,9 +16,11 @@
 #include <unistd.h>
 
 #include "access/relation.h"
+#include "catalog/index.h"
 #include "fmgr.h"
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "storage/bufmgr.h"
+#include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/read_stream.h"
 #include "storage/smgr.h"
 #include "utils/acl.h"
@@ -71,6 +73,8 @@ pg_prewarm(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	char	   *ttype;
 	PrewarmType ptype;
 	AclResult	aclresult;
+	char		relkind;
+	Oid			privOid;
 
 	/* Basic sanity checking. */
 	if (PG_ARGISNULL(0))
@@ -107,8 +111,31 @@ pg_prewarm(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	forkNumber = forkname_to_number(forkString);
 
 	/* Open relation and check privileges. */
+	relkind = get_rel_relkind(relOid);
+	if (relkind == RELKIND_INDEX ||
+		relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_INDEX)
+	{
+		privOid = IndexGetRelation(relOid, false);
+		LockRelationOid(privOid, AccessShareLock);
+	}
+	else
+		privOid = relOid;
+
 	rel = relation_open(relOid, AccessShareLock);
-	aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(relOid, GetUserId(), ACL_SELECT);
+
+	/*
+	 * If we did the IndexGetRelation() call above, it's barely possible that
+	 * a race against an index drop/recreation could have netted us the wrong
+	 * table.
+	 */
+	if (privOid != relOid &&
+		privOid != IndexGetRelation(relOid, true))
+		ereport(ERROR,
+				(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_TABLE),
+				 errmsg("could not find parent table of index \"%s\"",
+						RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
+
+	aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(privOid, GetUserId(), ACL_SELECT);
 	if (aclresult != ACLCHECK_OK)
 		aclcheck_error(aclresult, get_relkind_objtype(rel->rd_rel->relkind), get_rel_name(relOid));
 
@@ -233,8 +260,11 @@ pg_prewarm(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 		read_stream_end(stream);
 	}
 
-	/* Close relation, release lock. */
+	/* Close relation, release locks. */
 	relation_close(rel, AccessShareLock);
 
+	if (privOid != relOid)
+		UnlockRelationOid(privOid, AccessShareLock);
+
 	PG_RETURN_INT64(blocks_done);
 }
diff --git a/contrib/pg_prewarm/t/001_basic.pl b/contrib/pg_prewarm/t/001_basic.pl
index 0a8259d3678..a77ab67d29e 100644
--- a/contrib/pg_prewarm/t/001_basic.pl
+++ b/contrib/pg_prewarm/t/001_basic.pl
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ $node->start;
 $node->safe_psql("postgres",
 		"CREATE EXTENSION pg_prewarm;\n"
 	  . "CREATE TABLE test(c1 int);\n"
-	  . "INSERT INTO test SELECT generate_series(1, 100);");
+	  . "INSERT INTO test SELECT generate_series(1, 100);\n"
+	  . "CREATE INDEX test_idx ON test(c1);\n"
+	  . "CREATE ROLE test_user LOGIN;");
 
 # test read mode
 my $result =
@@ -42,6 +44,31 @@ ok( (        $stdout =~ qr/^[1-9][0-9]*$/
 		  or $stderr =~ qr/prefetch is not supported by this build/),
 	'prefetch mode succeeded');
 
+# test_user should be unable to prewarm table/index without privileges
+($cmdret, $stdout, $stderr) =
+  $node->psql(
+    "postgres", "SELECT pg_prewarm('test');",
+    extra_params => [ '--username' => 'test_user' ]);
+ok($stderr =~ /permission denied for table test/, 'pg_prewarm failed as expected');
+($cmdret, $stdout, $stderr) =
+  $node->psql(
+    "postgres", "SELECT pg_prewarm('test_idx');",
+    extra_params => [ '--username' => 'test_user' ]);
+ok($stderr =~ /permission denied for index test_idx/, 'pg_prewarm failed as expected');
+
+# test_user should be able to prewarm table/index with privileges
+$node->safe_psql("postgres", "GRANT SELECT ON test TO test_user;");
+$result =
+  $node->safe_psql(
+    "postgres", "SELECT pg_prewarm('test');",
+    extra_params => [ '--username' => 'test_user' ]);
+like($result, qr/^[1-9][0-9]*$/, 'pg_prewarm succeeded as expected');
+$result =
+  $node->safe_psql(
+    "postgres", "SELECT pg_prewarm('test_idx');",
+    extra_params => [ '--username' => 'test_user' ]);
+like($result, qr/^[1-9][0-9]*$/, 'pg_prewarm succeeded as expected');
+
 # test autoprewarm_dump_now()
 $result = $node->safe_psql("postgres", "SELECT autoprewarm_dump_now();");
 like($result, qr/^[1-9][0-9]*$/, 'autoprewarm_dump_now succeeded');
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)



Attachments:

  [text/plain] v4-0001-fix-priv-checks-in-stats-code.patch (1.1K, 2-v4-0001-fix-priv-checks-in-stats-code.patch)
  download | inline diff:
From 9cf6e507808cbd4a5c8b93422881ec078ce66f60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:24:28 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] fix priv checks in stats code

---
 src/backend/statistics/stat_utils.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/backend/statistics/stat_utils.c b/src/backend/statistics/stat_utils.c
index ef7e5168bed..8b8203a58e3 100644
--- a/src/backend/statistics/stat_utils.c
+++ b/src/backend/statistics/stat_utils.c
@@ -189,6 +189,17 @@ stats_lock_check_privileges(Oid reloid)
 
 		Assert(index->rd_index && index->rd_index->indrelid == table_oid);
 
+		/*
+		 * Since we did the IndexGetRelation() call above without any lock,
+		 * it's barely possible that a race against an index drop/recreation
+		 * could have netted us the wrong table.
+		 */
+		if (table_oid != IndexGetRelation(index_oid, true))
+			ereport(ERROR,
+					(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_TABLE),
+					 errmsg("could not find parent table of index \"%s\"",
+							RelationGetRelationName(index))));
+
 		/* retain lock on index */
 		relation_close(index, NoLock);
 	}
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)



  [text/plain] v4-0002-fix-priv-checks-in-index-code.patch (2.7K, 3-v4-0002-fix-priv-checks-in-index-code.patch)
  download | inline diff:
From 3f6d161c46456b95dfae949ecbe44bd028b6a37d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:24:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] fix priv checks in index code

---
 src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | 41 ++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
index ca2bde62e82..2a6e58eb0de 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
@@ -2976,6 +2976,7 @@ RangeVarCallbackForReindexIndex(const RangeVar *relation,
 	struct ReindexIndexCallbackState *state = arg;
 	LOCKMODE	table_lockmode;
 	Oid			table_oid;
+	AclResult	aclresult;
 
 	/*
 	 * Lock level here should match table lock in reindex_index() for
@@ -2985,12 +2986,8 @@ RangeVarCallbackForReindexIndex(const RangeVar *relation,
 	table_lockmode = (state->params.options & REINDEXOPT_CONCURRENTLY) != 0 ?
 		ShareUpdateExclusiveLock : ShareLock;
 
-	/*
-	 * If we previously locked some other index's heap, and the name we're
-	 * looking up no longer refers to that relation, release the now-useless
-	 * lock.
-	 */
-	if (relId != oldRelId && OidIsValid(oldRelId))
+	/* Unlock any previously locked heap. */
+	if (OidIsValid(state->locked_table_oid))
 	{
 		UnlockRelationOid(state->locked_table_oid, table_lockmode);
 		state->locked_table_oid = InvalidOid;
@@ -3014,30 +3011,22 @@ RangeVarCallbackForReindexIndex(const RangeVar *relation,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
 				 errmsg("\"%s\" is not an index", relation->relname)));
 
-	/* Check permissions */
+	/*
+	 * If the OID isn't valid, it means the index was concurrently dropped,
+	 * which is not a problem for us; just return normally.
+	 */
 	table_oid = IndexGetRelation(relId, true);
-	if (OidIsValid(table_oid))
-	{
-		AclResult	aclresult;
+	if (!OidIsValid(table_oid))
+		return;
 
-		aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(table_oid, GetUserId(), ACL_MAINTAIN);
-		if (aclresult != ACLCHECK_OK)
-			aclcheck_error(aclresult, OBJECT_INDEX, relation->relname);
-	}
+	/* Check permissions */
+	aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(table_oid, GetUserId(), ACL_MAINTAIN);
+	if (aclresult != ACLCHECK_OK)
+		aclcheck_error(aclresult, OBJECT_INDEX, relation->relname);
 
 	/* Lock heap before index to avoid deadlock. */
-	if (relId != oldRelId)
-	{
-		/*
-		 * If the OID isn't valid, it means the index was concurrently
-		 * dropped, which is not a problem for us; just return normally.
-		 */
-		if (OidIsValid(table_oid))
-		{
-			LockRelationOid(table_oid, table_lockmode);
-			state->locked_table_oid = table_oid;
-		}
-	}
+	LockRelationOid(table_oid, table_lockmode);
+	state->locked_table_oid = table_oid;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)



  [text/plain] v4-0003-fix-priv-checks-in-pg_prewarm.patch (4.4K, 4-v4-0003-fix-priv-checks-in-pg_prewarm.patch)
  download | inline diff:
From 2c1da2d3db13603da4b2cded4a2dcf0d86614ca0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:47:02 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] fix priv checks in pg_prewarm

---
 contrib/pg_prewarm/pg_prewarm.c   | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 contrib/pg_prewarm/t/001_basic.pl | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/pg_prewarm/pg_prewarm.c b/contrib/pg_prewarm/pg_prewarm.c
index b968933ea8b..810a291204b 100644
--- a/contrib/pg_prewarm/pg_prewarm.c
+++ b/contrib/pg_prewarm/pg_prewarm.c
@@ -16,9 +16,11 @@
 #include <unistd.h>
 
 #include "access/relation.h"
+#include "catalog/index.h"
 #include "fmgr.h"
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "storage/bufmgr.h"
+#include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/read_stream.h"
 #include "storage/smgr.h"
 #include "utils/acl.h"
@@ -71,6 +73,8 @@ pg_prewarm(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	char	   *ttype;
 	PrewarmType ptype;
 	AclResult	aclresult;
+	char		relkind;
+	Oid			privOid;
 
 	/* Basic sanity checking. */
 	if (PG_ARGISNULL(0))
@@ -107,8 +111,31 @@ pg_prewarm(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	forkNumber = forkname_to_number(forkString);
 
 	/* Open relation and check privileges. */
+	relkind = get_rel_relkind(relOid);
+	if (relkind == RELKIND_INDEX ||
+		relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_INDEX)
+	{
+		privOid = IndexGetRelation(relOid, false);
+		LockRelationOid(privOid, AccessShareLock);
+	}
+	else
+		privOid = relOid;
+
 	rel = relation_open(relOid, AccessShareLock);
-	aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(relOid, GetUserId(), ACL_SELECT);
+
+	/*
+	 * If we did the IndexGetRelation() call above, it's barely possible that
+	 * a race against an index drop/recreation could have netted us the wrong
+	 * table.
+	 */
+	if (privOid != relOid &&
+		privOid != IndexGetRelation(relOid, true))
+		ereport(ERROR,
+				(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_TABLE),
+				 errmsg("could not find parent table of index \"%s\"",
+						RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
+
+	aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(privOid, GetUserId(), ACL_SELECT);
 	if (aclresult != ACLCHECK_OK)
 		aclcheck_error(aclresult, get_relkind_objtype(rel->rd_rel->relkind), get_rel_name(relOid));
 
@@ -233,8 +260,11 @@ pg_prewarm(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 		read_stream_end(stream);
 	}
 
-	/* Close relation, release lock. */
+	/* Close relation, release locks. */
 	relation_close(rel, AccessShareLock);
 
+	if (privOid != relOid)
+		UnlockRelationOid(privOid, AccessShareLock);
+
 	PG_RETURN_INT64(blocks_done);
 }
diff --git a/contrib/pg_prewarm/t/001_basic.pl b/contrib/pg_prewarm/t/001_basic.pl
index 0a8259d3678..a77ab67d29e 100644
--- a/contrib/pg_prewarm/t/001_basic.pl
+++ b/contrib/pg_prewarm/t/001_basic.pl
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ $node->start;
 $node->safe_psql("postgres",
 		"CREATE EXTENSION pg_prewarm;\n"
 	  . "CREATE TABLE test(c1 int);\n"
-	  . "INSERT INTO test SELECT generate_series(1, 100);");
+	  . "INSERT INTO test SELECT generate_series(1, 100);\n"
+	  . "CREATE INDEX test_idx ON test(c1);\n"
+	  . "CREATE ROLE test_user LOGIN;");
 
 # test read mode
 my $result =
@@ -42,6 +44,31 @@ ok( (        $stdout =~ qr/^[1-9][0-9]*$/
 		  or $stderr =~ qr/prefetch is not supported by this build/),
 	'prefetch mode succeeded');
 
+# test_user should be unable to prewarm table/index without privileges
+($cmdret, $stdout, $stderr) =
+  $node->psql(
+    "postgres", "SELECT pg_prewarm('test');",
+    extra_params => [ '--username' => 'test_user' ]);
+ok($stderr =~ /permission denied for table test/, 'pg_prewarm failed as expected');
+($cmdret, $stdout, $stderr) =
+  $node->psql(
+    "postgres", "SELECT pg_prewarm('test_idx');",
+    extra_params => [ '--username' => 'test_user' ]);
+ok($stderr =~ /permission denied for index test_idx/, 'pg_prewarm failed as expected');
+
+# test_user should be able to prewarm table/index with privileges
+$node->safe_psql("postgres", "GRANT SELECT ON test TO test_user;");
+$result =
+  $node->safe_psql(
+    "postgres", "SELECT pg_prewarm('test');",
+    extra_params => [ '--username' => 'test_user' ]);
+like($result, qr/^[1-9][0-9]*$/, 'pg_prewarm succeeded as expected');
+$result =
+  $node->safe_psql(
+    "postgres", "SELECT pg_prewarm('test_idx');",
+    extra_params => [ '--username' => 'test_user' ]);
+like($result, qr/^[1-9][0-9]*$/, 'pg_prewarm succeeded as expected');
+
 # test autoprewarm_dump_now()
 $result = $node->safe_psql("postgres", "SELECT autoprewarm_dump_now();");
 like($result, qr/^[1-9][0-9]*$/, 'autoprewarm_dump_now succeeded');
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)



view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
  In-Reply-To: <aNQhuRQfD3PlpeuT@nathan>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox