Feedback-ID: i76984098:Fastmail
Message-ID: <b319261b-3e06-41f9-9772-1a1747ede2b1@aklaver.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:17:23 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Query optimization
To: Durgamahesh Manne <maheshpostgres9@gmail.com>,
 pgsql-general <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
References: <CAJCZkoL+DHs0H9enQEg8JXZw=7032zrmFKG8Vx0fup6_wqNpnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJCZkoL+DHs0H9enQEg8JXZw=7032zrmFKG8Vx0fup6_wqNpnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b319261b-3e06-41f9-9772-1a1747ede2b1%40aklaver.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 3/13/25 12:12, Durgamahesh Manne wrote:
> Hi Team
> 
> This query takes more time than usual for execution

Define usual.


> How to optimize it in best possible way

Can't be answered without, to start:

1) Postgres version.

2) Complete(including indexes) table schema.

3) Output of EXPLAIN ANALYZE of query.

4) In what client is this being run?


> 
> Columns used in this query >> composite index eventhough not running 
> optimally
> 
> 
> 
> SELECT EXISTS (SELECT Key FROM CACHEKEYS WHERE CacheType = $1 AND TrsId 
> = $2 AND BrandId = $3 AND SportId = $4 AND CompetitionId = $5 AND 
> EventId = $6 AND MarketId = $7 LIMIT ?)
> 
> Regards
> Durga Mahesh

-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com